|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Is everything made of the same material? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Good question, and one which impacts many premises. Yes, IMHO, all life was made from earthly material, and this can be accounted for by a reductionism: calcium and other minerals are earthly components. However, there must also be another factor involved, because the dust of earth's matter does not result in life by itself, even given eons of light years. We have similar conditions on the moon. I see it as an external triggering factor being required to interact with earthly material to activate life - else nothing happens. The premise life begins in and from inanimate matter of and by itself is unsustained, and never seen here or in other planets. The premise that earth contains a special mix to condone life is also not sustained, including that water is not seen elsewhere. Pineapples are also not seen elsewhere. Life requires a complete and vast array of structures, with each structure intergrated to all others in a critical design, and one which contradicts the chance premise, even an accumulated series of chance occurences, which compound the odss at every treshold - thereby only increasing the odds for life by itself. Vegetation and other food products constitute only one of 100s of 1000s of other intergrated structures required to support life. The premise that earth is the exact critical distance from the sun, for example, to produce vegetation, is unsustainable: we have vegetation in the deepest recesses of the oceans, where light won't reach it - this affirms that a criticl light is not the factor, and that life could have evolved in different distances from the sun. The principle of life requiring critical conditions, even if correct, does not mean only critical conditions of earth - it means 'critical conditions' - period! IOW, if life could emerge here in prevailing over one million adverse conditions - it aught to prevail over 2 million adverse conditions elsewhere. The premise life requires water but cannot evolved without it, is as naive and simplistic as saying water creates life. In fact, we can pick out any of a million factors which would negate life if it were not prevailent. Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Mitochondria is tself a derivitive of an already exiting life form, namely bacteria. IOW, life already existed before this product emerged.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Is an error gross or is gross an error?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: These are inter-changeable, relative to its context.
quote: Conditions to survive, and activation, are two different paradigms. The life seen in a swamp, for example, did not initiate solely because of earth-like conditions, is my point. Further, to survive, conditions have to be intergrated and designed in a way the subject is receptive. A mother can support an off-spring, but the emerging life is condusive - signifying a hovering program which incorporates both. Life is involuntary.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Catch up on your native language, if you think that statement is not grammatically fine. Find out if your error was gross, and know how gross your error is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: A month of miles is not the same. The cluster of Virgo is not merely so many miles away, but expressed in the time it takes that light to reach earth. That is why it is termed light YEARS.
quote: Life is not intiated only by earthly matters.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Derived by secs, mins, day, months of a year. A light year distance = 1 year light travel.
quote: There's no evidence of its antithesis either.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: The dif is that unlike light years, 'many miles' is not a quotient of years. My usage may be novel, but not nonsensical. Everyone understood. English is a pliable language, not a wooden one - get with it, folks!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: No, you cannot align a generic association here, because that is not a constant, as with distance and light years. The distance of a star gives an equivalent period of time: these are interactive.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3668 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Re Is everything made of the same matter.
This requires a preamble: 1. TIME, MATHS, ENERGY, & MATTER, are *THIS* side of the universe - meaning they did not create the universe, nor did they exist before the universe, but are post universe components. Matter does not exist without energy; time does not exist without matter. And vice versa, can energy exist without matter? The same applies with time. 2. Nothing is 'superfluous' in the universe. 3. All the components of the universe are 'intergrated'. Time is not an independent component: just as energy and matter are receptive to one another, time is reflective of both of them. Eg: pi, radius-circumference ratios, right angles of a triangle, the limits of numbers in a space - are reflective, 'Mathematical' indexes of energy and matter. The same applies with the 'Time' of a pregnancy; the period of a pineapple from a seed; the variant period limits of a human life span and a quark; the planetary rotations and Gravity are reflective indexs of matter and energy. 3. 'Intergration' means: Nothing happens without the interaction of minimum two components ('duality) and nothing happens with one component ('singularity'): One (Singularity) does not exist in the universe. That a single cell amoeaba acitivates itself without a duality is an error: the cell has numerous components; even the impacting force (heat, energt, time etc) which interacts here serves as a duality counterpart. Conclusion: None of these components apply outside a universe scenario. These would be superfluous pre-universe, violating the 'Interaction' premise. Would a car wheel apply on Jupiter?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024