I simply don't see it that way. I don't know if you can explain it so I will.
The nature of the reproduction, the introduction of variations and the selection are very different in form. So I see different definitions.
The evolution of technology differs in that:
1) a variation is chosen to meet a goal and the goal comes first.
2) the variation can come from anywhere it is not constrained by what the parents have, by having to produce a step that still gives a viable intermediate. I.e., IC an be overcome in one leap without "scaffolding" or "pre-adaption".
3) there is very little "trail and error" instead of the entire selection process being trail and error.
I'm thinkin' there is more but I'm heading out. That is enough, for me, to demonstrate the large lack of similarity.