Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 11.0
Doddy
Member (Idle past 5909 days)
Posts: 563
From: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 01-04-2007


Message 217 of 304 (412978)
07-27-2007 2:54 AM
Reply to: Message 209 by Rob
07-26-2007 4:01 PM


Re: Nosy over extending his nose....
Rob writes:
I guess molbiogirl, Doddy, Matt P, and Kuresu are not strong enough in the mind of Nosy to keep me under control. Do you four concur?
It is my thread. Personally, I think you do go off on tangents that belong in the 'Is it science?' area etc, but when you do actually stick to the topic (like discussing the possible precursors to nucleotide triphosphates as energy transport molecules), it's not bad.
Thus, don't talk about empiricism, materialism, etymology etc in my thread. However, I don't think banning you from that area is the best option, though perhaps easier than the alternative. I would prefer either that you stayed on topic, or that the moderators simply hid/removed all the irrelevant stuff.
Edited by Doddy, : grama!!1

Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today!
We seek contributors with a knowledge of Intelligent design to expand and review our page on this topic.
Registration not needed for editing most pages (the ID page is an exception), but you can register here!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Rob, posted 07-26-2007 4:01 PM Rob has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024