|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1406 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Definition for the Theory of Evolution | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3669 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
double post
Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3669 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
The two most pivotal factors impacting evolution as per darwin, would be:
Is Evolution effected by a finite universe; and what % of data transmissions is due to evolution after the 'seed' transmission is considered and factored in? Outside of these two factors, the rest of darwin's research appears applicable to a process which does not necessarilly belong to evolution: at least 99% of all transmissions are manifestly from the host via the seed; a finite universe, namely one which emerged without any pre-existing products, appears better alligned with Genesis, including that the universe structures and products were not the result of a self-generating evolution but the extension of a designed program. A finite universe, but which structures are intergrated, negates the premise of randomness. Eg: one can theorise a mobile phone and its battery is random - but not when we include a intergrated chip in the scenario.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wounded King Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: |
You don't appear to have put a definition for the theory of evolution, or any comment on the previously proposed definitions, in to your incomprehensible gibberish filled post.
Are you off topic or just unable to write coherently? TTFN, WK
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3669 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Any definition of evolution, theory included, has to account if it is a universal constant or not; if it is rendered superfluous by the 'seed' factor. Else it is incomprehensible.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1406 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
As noted you are off topic here.
...if it is a universal constant or not; if it is rendered superfluous by the 'seed' factor. I suggest you start a thread on this so you can have your position well defined and allow people to refute it without affecting this thread with the inanity required. Thank you. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminNosy Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: |
Some hours to think before you post utter gibberish again. Soon you will start to lose science thread privileges totally.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1406 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
What I have arrived at so far:
The theory of evolution is that hereditary traits of species change over time, that the change is enabled by the available variations (diversity) within populations due to past accumulations of different mutations in hereditary traits, and that the changes made within each generation are those selected by the differential response of organisms to passing on their hereditary traits under prevailing ecological pressures. I think that covers the basics. Enjoy. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3669 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
I dont think it is off topic to render a definition of evolution in a thread of this name. So I can't abide such a ridiculous ask! Your welcome.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 285 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
The problem is that what you're saying doesn't mean anything.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3669 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote:Assuming that water is discovered on another planet or space body, and that planet is older than the earth: would this negate the evolution theory if life is not also found on that planet? At least, it may be deemed not a universal constant? Life, via evolutionary adaptation, would not depend on a critical mix of conditions exclusive to this planet, to effect life. Adaptation, if this has credibility [it is a theory only, not a fact], cannot be just the ability to prevail over 'this' planet's negative, harsh conditions and evolve into life; it has to adapt and prevail under 'different' harsh conditions also - else life is a result of a focused, specialised impact, obviously limited to this planet in the known universe, rather than it being a universal constant. There is already life on earth on the harshest conditions imaginable - such as volcanoes and where light never reaches. Why not elsewhere? IMHO, there is no life out there. The math and logics say so. Defining evolution thus requires absolute clarification if it is a universal constant - or posited as an oddity limited to this planet only. Because this factor proposes epochial impacts on the validity of evolution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPaul Inactive Member |
You're heading for another suspension. Stick to the definitions, and leave your arguments about evolution out of it. And try to phrase them in meaningful English instead of your own personal jargon in future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
Defining evolution thus requires absolute clarification if it is a universal constant It is not a constant - it is a theory. However, it is universally applicable, and not just to biological life. That is why it can be generalised so easily. Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3669 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Any examples?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 285 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Bi - o - lo - gy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
Any examples? Of what? There is a specific theory of biological evolution, which obviously only discusses biological evolution. However, there is a more general wording which can be applied to any population of entities with imperfect transmission of hereditary units. An example that we can point to on this are virtual populations existing in a computer's memory. We can also look to language and culture as things which exist in populations and that change over time - but they are a little esoteric. There isn't much more I can say to a two word response, I'm afraid.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024