|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5937 days) Posts: 563 From: Brisbane, Australia Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Creationist Method | |||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 312 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
I'm intrigued. Will it contain a single new idea, or will it just be the same ol' creationist nonsense only more ungrammatical than usual?
And who on Earth do you suppose is going to publish someone who writes like you do? Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
hush hush dr a, we will have to wait and see.
as for the obvious question, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
After reading it you will be enraged and I am looking forward to it. i am quite looking forward to it myself, ray. will you post it online somewhere, or are you actually publishing?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3696 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: 'Seed' is absolutely appropriate, anticipating all future generations. Depending on the life form, all transmissions for an offspring are via the seed. The same applies to 'kind' - humans are NOT different by virtue of their bone structure nor the size of their brains. Genesis correctly distinquishes humans by 'speech'. Its deniers will eventually come around - as with all their other failed denials. That a seed shall follow its own kind, needs no evidencing. It is perhaps the most widely manifest fact in the universe. Its not a theory!
quote: The issue is the reverse: its denial is the grotesque which needs to be addressed. That evolution does not consider the seed relevent to an offspring is abject denial of the first recording of a scientific equation. It means you have to evidence it as wrong - prove evolution without any translission via the seed. The latter is where science, math and history enters the picture - not before. Both science and medicine has a source point! Edited by IamJoseph, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3696 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Will contain the role of the seed, and that Genesis contains the first scientific equation?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
all transmissions for an offspring are via the seed. "seed" can have two (closely related) meanings:
That evolution does not consider the seed relevent to an offspring is abject denial of the first recording of a scientific equation. this statement is utter nonsense. first you have (again) used a word as if it is somehow independent (or opposite) from its definition. how would eevolution possibly fail to consider offspring relevant to offspring? that's anti-tautological. and of course evolution realizes that sperm is an integral part of making offspring.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Will contain the role of the seed, and that Genesis contains the first scientific equation? i am unaware of what the contents of ray's book will be. perhaps mr. martinez can illuminate the matter for us? but i suspect we will have to wait and see when (if) it is published.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adminastasia Inactive Member |
Seeds? Books?
The thread is about CHARTS! Stop it, or I am going to learn how to do suspensions. Please use one of the following links to ask questions or comment on admin messages:
Helpful links for New Members:
Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], and Practice Makes Perfect
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3696 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Yes, carnal knowledge and arson are listed as crimes. Slavery was confronted nowhere else than by the OT laws. Lets hope your science is any better.
quote: Yes, modern banking resulted because Europe's medevial churches accidently left out money lending from its list of decrees bariing jews and other non-christians from every vocation one can imagine.
quote: True. Half the world is at risk today from consuming shell fish, which are scavengers that consume toxics, and its proper cleansing is not observed. This is a correct advocation, when science was not yet developed. Consumption of shell fish poses a greater risk factor than any other foods - if not properly cleansed, which is very difficult: it can kill or damage for life. Medicine, including the first advocation of washing of hands to eliminate 90% of contact transferred bacteria, was introduced in the OT. One cannot describe creationism if their knowledge of the OT is so insignificant and distorted. All world accepted laws come from the OT - exclusively. Not a single law accepted by the world's institutions come from any other source. Feel free to name us one!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3696 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Fire away. Or change the name of this thread.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
joe, one forum member to another, don't tempt the mods. you've been having a run of suspensions recently, and it certainly is no credit to creationists and fundamentalists that they can't seem follow the rules of civilized debate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3696 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Explain the name of this thread - the only thing not addressed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
read the op.
describe and discuss what the method creationists use for research -- if indeed creationists do research -- and how it is similar to or differs from the scientific method. as a creationist, you should probably be adding information about the procedures used by yourself or prominent creationists for arriving at "the truth."
|
|||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3696 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
That's where you get evidence of the 'seed', representing transmissions of life forms - ignored by atheists; that 'kind' represents an evidential proof what separates humans from all other life forms - ignored by atheists. I call it selective atheism, and slight of hand science. I'm not fooled.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1372 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
That's where what's where? your statement lacks a specified subject -- there's a pronoun but no antecedant.
you get evidence of the 'seed', representing transmissions of life forms - ignored by atheists; please explain what this has to do with the topic, what exaclty you mean by "seed," and how the creationist method (whatever it is) does not ignore this (whatever it is) and how the "atheist" scientific method does.
that 'kind' represents an evidential proof what separates humans from all other life forms this statement lacks a preposition somewhere. should that be "of what separates... " possibly? please explain how you are using the term "kind" in quotes, and how such a word represents a difference, in regards to the bible (where it is applied to many different, uh, kinds of things including humans AND animals AND plants), or science, or the creationist method.
I call it selective atheism, call what "selective atheism?" when are atheists being selective about believing in god? do they believe in god at some times, but not others? or for some reasons, but not others? how is atheism particularly relevent to the scientific method?
and slight of hand science. I'm not fooled. what is slight of hand? what do you feel is being "palmed" away? please don't feel the grammar-nitpicks are quibbles designed to distract from any point you might. i honestly cannot figure out what you are trying to say. it seems to you have become somewhat accustomed to posting pure unadulterated nonsense. not in terms of content or points being argued, but in terms of simply stringing together gibberish and failing to elaborate on the specifics of yoru argument. please elaborate.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024