no. but the biggest problem behind the evc debate is that the assumption in the creationist camp (and among some evolutionists) is that the entire purpose of evolution is to disprove god.
then the discussion becomes this deathgrip between metaphysics and cold research. they're simply not comparable at all and to propose the argument is foolhardy.
the problem is that the argument shouldn't be made, but it is every day, right here. it's not you. your concept of the expression of god within nature, whether theologically flawed or not, is the heart of the issue. if nature happened through mechanism, that takes the magic out of it for so many. for me, it adds to the magic.
also, i look forward to having you.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.