Why waste time beating up Ray a hundred times when you have a chance at a fresh mind - one that might actually learn to think? I wouldn't be surprized if a lot of newbies are scared off by the "sophisticated" arguments of the hard cases and don't bother to post their simple questions.
I usually do not respond to insult or invective. The comment above, at face value, appears insulting - but it really is not.
Of course the comment presupposes that I (a Creationist) have been bested in debate due to my inability to think. Since the comment was written by an Evolutionist, logically, it means the exact opposite. It is a compliment to be "insulted" this way by an Evolutionist. Anytime that I (or any Creationist) is complimented by the Evolutionist it is the best evidence that we are like them (= morons). Evolutionists believe apes morphed into men and that the appearance of design that is overwhelmingly seen in nature does not reflect invisible Designer but a stupid blind process (natural selection) that only exists in their head. They also believe that all living things evolved from one common ancestor that lived hundreds of millions of years ago. Intelligent persons, after remembering this, can see why it is a compliment to be rejected (and insulted) by persons who believe these atheistic and nonsensical things.
I am very glad evolutionists reject and insult me; their approval would prove my wrongness - glad I didn't get it.
As for the topic title: "What is an Articulate Informed Creationist" it is ridiculous! As if any evolutionist is going to say that a Creationist is as such! If any evolutionist says that a Creationist is as such then that person is not a real Creationist.
This whole topic is silly and should be shut down.
Ray
Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.