Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9214 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: Cifa.ac
Post Volume: Total: 920,095 Year: 417/6,935 Month: 417/275 Week: 134/159 Day: 12/33 Hour: 1/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Social Issues and Creation/Evolution ⇒

Homosexuality and Natural Selection.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality and Natural Selection.
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 169 of 243 (414343)
08-03-2007 9:14 PM 		Reply to: Message 168 by Hyroglyphx
08-03-2007 8:59 PM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
what purpose would it serve nature to select a specie that does not have the desire to reproduce?
Who said homosexuals don't have the desire to reproduce? They have a sexual attraction to the same sex, that doesn't mean that they're incapable of reproducing or lack the desire.
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-03-2007 8:59 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-04-2007 12:35 AM DrJones* has replied
  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 171 of 243 (414428)
08-04-2007 3:25 AM 		Reply to: Message 170 by Hyroglyphx
08-04-2007 12:35 AM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
A woman and a woman are incapable of producing offspring.
And so they get a sperm donor.
​
A man and a man are incapable of producing offspring.
And so they get an egg donor and a rental uterus.
​
If they want to copulate with only members of the same sex, that would prevent the desire of reproduction.
False.
​
Homosexuals seem to be the very antithesis to the theory of evolution, as it literally, serves no evolutionary purpose to be one.
Kuresu provide a rebuttal to this way back in Message 3
​
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
​
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-04-2007 12:35 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-04-2007 1:34 PM DrJones* has replied
  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 179 of 243 (414523)
08-04-2007 2:18 PM 		Reply to: Message 177 by Hyroglyphx
08-04-2007 1:34 PM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
This is an argument from nature
Ok, a gay man wants to have a child, therefore he has sex with a woman, baby produced. Or are you trying to say that if someone doesn't want to do something, they will never ever do it even to satisfy another desire?
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-04-2007 1:34 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 2:04 PM DrJones* has replied
  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 185 of 243 (414634)
08-05-2007 2:17 PM 		Reply to: Message 184 by Hyroglyphx
08-05-2007 2:04 PM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
clearly we can see that homosexuals are weaker in evolutionary terms, because the desire for progeny is removed.
Except you haven't shown that the desire to reproduce has been removed, you've merely asserted it.
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 2:04 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 6:09 PM DrJones* has replied
  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 191 of 243 (414724)
08-05-2007 10:00 PM 		Reply to: Message 187 by Hyroglyphx
08-05-2007 6:09 PM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
They have no want or desire to be with members of the opposite sex.
And how does that remove the desire to reproduce? I have no want or desire to eat my mother's lasagna (she puts in way too much spinach) but I do it anyways cause I have a desire to please her. One desire can override another.
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-05-2007 6:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 231 of 243 (414903)
08-06-2007 9:42 PM 		Reply to: Message 230 by Hyroglyphx
08-06-2007 8:57 PM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
how can natural selection favor them if they have effectively lost the natural will to procreate?
Can you actually show that homosexuals don't have the desire to procreate or are you gonna keep on asserting it with no support?
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-06-2007 8:57 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 235 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-07-2007 5:45 PM DrJones* has replied
  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2351
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.0

Normal Thread Display
Message 236 of 243 (415017)
08-07-2007 5:53 PM 		Reply to: Message 235 by Hyroglyphx
08-07-2007 5:45 PM

Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
Conclusion: Homosexuality is not a natural proclivity
How can it not be natural when we see it in nature?
​
So how natural is it for homosexuals to go against their own nature just to have children?
About as natural as it is for heterosexuals to go against their own nature and not have children.
​
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.
​
Live every week like it's Shark Week!
Just a monkey in a long line of kings.
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist!
*not an actual doctor
This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-07-2007 5:45 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025