The cat is just one those charming oddball stories people tell. It's like crashfrog's own charming oddball story, which he tells elsewhere, of American journalists who go to work 'systematically hostile' to the very political ideas they are most likely to hold. Such a notion hardly represents a reasoned analysis of comprehensive data. It's just a tale that, like the necrophiliac feline, gets indulged for its story appeal over its logic.
But this is off-topic here. Why don't you go back to that thread and actually address the points and data that crashfrog brought up? Ignoring the substantive points in that thread, just saying "nuh-uh", and then crowing
in a different unrelated thread how it's just a fairy tale seems to be...rather creationist.
I've done everything the Bible says, even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff! -- Ned Flanders
™ Version 4.2
