|
Understanding through Discussion |
|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
|
| |
| popoi | |
| Total: 916,334 Year: 3,591/9,624 Month: 462/974 Week: 75/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 0/2 |
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
| Author | Topic: Standards of Evidence | |||||||||||||||||||
|
NosyNed Member  Posts: 9003 From: Canada Joined: |
However the trouble with this sweeping brush approach is that it does leave the door open for other broad "interpretations" in a way that a specific measurable predicted quantity (for example) does not.  - I keep waiting for someone to deliver on of these other interpretations. I think there is room to keep drilling down into more detail in the same manner. The bird reptile prediction, whale transitionals, fish-amphibian etc. are examples. ABEI agree that in an uncontrolled non-lab environment each individual piece of data is less compelling (generally anyway - just to wish wash) Edited by NosyNed, : added a bit
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Straggler Member  Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
