Vaginal sex also has the potential to pass along dangerous pathogens. Is that wrong, too?
Yes it is when you know that the pathogens are there, such as someone who already knows they have an STD.
It came from god. Happy?
Ok, you get a memo from god that says beastiality is wrong and I'll stop arguing.
I haven't said whether it was wrong or right yet.
Not in my book. If you've missed this, I already said many times that I'm a moral absolutist.
And you derive your morals from what?
And I already addressed this, but for some reason you just ignored it. All forms of physical contacts have the potential to pass along diseases that we'd rather not have.
It's about accessing the risk, and determining if the risk is worth it. Not whether the chance exists or not.
Ok, let's make it a law forbidding all forms of sexual activity, including vaginal sex. How will people reproduce? They go to a lab and get invitro. Happy?
Ever here of safe sex? IT's a multi billion dollar ad campaign.
Getting a disease from having sex with a goat is a lot less likely than getting a disease from having sex with a sexually promiscuous person.
Neither of which I find morally correct. Even though it happens.
If disease is truely your concern, we should make it mandatory for everyone to reproduce through a lab rather than sex.
That is just not necessary.
Ok, since the rate of infection of AIDS is right now highest among straight black women who are getting them from straight black men, who in turn are getting them from other black women, we should ban black people from having sex.
Those people need not be banned. They are taking care of themselves.
Tell me you think it is morally correct for a black man knowingly have sex with a black woman, when he has AIDS?
I just can't believe you really believe your own argument, seeing how obviously flawed it is. If disease really is your concern, why not address the mainstream sexual behaviors? Why target minority groups? What's your agenda? Just tell us directly.
I don't have an argument, I asked a question. My agenda exists only in your imagination.
But I was thinking today, and I will pose another question. Straggler asked why it is wrong, I am asking why it is right.
Why would bestiality be right?
Because you feel so? Can we just start doing whatever we feel? Just because we want to? Does that make it right?
Morals are subjective Taz.
quote:
According to moral absolutists, morals are inherent in the laws of the universe,
from wikipedia.
Your going to tell me that your puny little mind somehow knows the moral standard of the universe? Give me a fuckin break.
What a joke.
You are way to high on that pedestal. You should just go back to being Christian. At least you would have an excuse.
™ Version 4.2
