Help me find a hypocrite!

Why would you need help finding out how much of a hypocrite she is?A google search on, why Hillary Clinton is a hypocrite returned 337,000 pages.Here's one.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.../04/20/AR2007042001589.htmlThat's on the heels of her making a plea to stop world wide prostitution. She gets her money from people who glorify the things she denounces.Not to mention she is just an outright liar.I would love to see a woman as President, but not her. She has a paper thin record, and is running on her husband's success.They should name a dance after her, called the sidestep tango.My question to is, why would one side be any better than the other?
There is no difference between the word politician, and hypocrite.Arnold for President!Edited by riVeRraT, : No reason given.

Being popular doesnt make you skillful.I live in NY, and I have yet to experience anything positive from her. Pretty much any time I pay attention to her, it's like a joke.Last thing I really got involved in was her kooky ideas for health coverage for the US, when Clinton was President. Arnold is in politics, but he's no politician.If Arnold's well meaning, isn't enough to make him president, then what is? A good liar?

Nuggin, I am well aware of what rappers mean when they say things. I actually *gasp* hang out with black people, and even preferred hanging with the brothers over most of the white people I knew in the city.Alot of it is uncalled for, and glorifies bad things.It's ok if you want to rap about what is bad in your life, and express that you would like some kind of change, or even just to rap about it, but not to glorify it, I don't find that constructive at all. And so do many black people.Here is another article that shows she takes money from people who are into the "wrong" aspect of prostitution.
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/hypocrit.htmI can't vouch if it's true or not, but it wouldn't surprise me.Hillary has all these morals, until it comes to the dollar, then it's out the window, and anything goes. That's my impression of her.I even feel staying with her husband, was just apolitical move on her part, and had nothing to do with love.IT all depends on what the meaning of "is" is.

Personal bias based on what I see and read.So what, it still could be true. I've seen enough from this lady, that I am not interested in following what she is doing.You claim it is my personal bias, but what else to we have to go on but the media, isn't your argument with the media? You've just admitted that the media sucks then.Besides, I see Hillary as the type of person that would never admit to anything, just like her husband, maybe I am wrong and it is love.I did mention that anyway, so why point it out?Anyone who would stick up for her, is wasting their time, she has no integrity.Edited by riVeRraT, : No reason given.Edited by riVeRraT, : No reason given.

nator called him well meaning, argue with her, she has an education.Besides, isn't being a pervert some kind of requirement to be a politician?

That's already been done.

Exactly.And here is a quote from the link you provided."I have also spoken out against the culture of violence and sex in the media, comparing this growing problem to a disease that, if left untreated, will become an epidemic."But she takes money from those very same rappers.Also interesting was this quote:
"I have championed legislation that would create the first-ever coordinated research center devoted to revealing the impact of media on our children. This center would focus particularly on the impact of media on infants, an area that is widely not understood, and on the growing link between television viewing and childhood obesity."From which you say there is no problem at all. So the politician you are sticking up for, goes against your own morals.She is a threat to our constitution, according to your very own logic.I am not interesting in debating about Hillary Clinton, her own actions should speak for themselves.

And just what do you think that survey would be used for? Keep your BS comments to yourself.

Why should I? I didn't make that accusation, you did.

No, you didn't the second time, you asked:
Oh, and are you going to provide evidence that Senator Clinton is a madam in a brothel, or heads an international prostitution cartel, or similar?Two different things.

If Hillary takes money to support her own agenda, from people who are well known to be involved in those things, doesn't that make her part of it?

MMMMMM, wonder what that was.....Here is a question (and it is not loaded taz), would certain plants benefit more from and increase of CO2 than others, and then create an imbalance in our eco system?

Of course it is. If Hillary Clintons morals matched her pocket book, then she wouldn't take money (money earned from the things she is against) from people like Timbaland. One of the links I provided shows where Timbalands head is at.It is the same reasoning behind why big companies withdrew their advertising from the Don Imus show. They did not want to be associated with him, in fear that they would be accused of supporting what he said.It's just not good politics, and I find it hypocritical.

No....it means they support it then. Which if they publically denounced it, would make them hypocrites.

No I am not saying that at all. You are connected.Here is another instance:
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/hypocrit.htm