Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,783 Year: 4,040/9,624 Month: 911/974 Week: 238/286 Day: 45/109 Hour: 2/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Help me find a hypocrite!
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 112 of 160 (415632)
08-11-2007 9:46 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by riVeRraT
08-10-2007 7:30 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
quote:
Being popular doesnt make you skillful.
I live in NY, and I have yet to experience anything positive from her. Pretty much any time I pay attention to her, it's like a joke.
Last thing I really got involved in was her kooky ideas for health coverage for the US, when Clinton was President.
What kooky ideas?
If they are all hypocrites, then so is Arnold. He's just as bad, right?
quote:
Arnold is in politics, but he's no politician.
Bullshit. He's a very skillful politician, otherwise he couldn't have gotten elected as a Republican in California.
quote:
If Arnold's well meaning, isn't enough to make him president, then what is? A good liar?
Well, he wasn't born in the US, so that disqualifies him right there.
He isn't experienced enough to be president, either.
He's not done a very good job in California, in case you haven't noticed.
Oh, and since you are a father, I thoght you might like to read this page on Senator Clinton's website that outlines her efforts in the Senate to improve services to children and families.
Have you ever been to her website and read about her positions on the issues and her votes?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by riVeRraT, posted 08-10-2007 7:30 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by riVeRraT, posted 08-11-2007 3:11 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 113 of 160 (415634)
08-11-2007 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by Answers in Gene Simmons
08-11-2007 9:16 AM


Neither of these are what the OP is about, though.
The example we are looking for is the democrat or liberal version of something like "Republican legislator who pushed for ban on public sex arrested for having sex in public".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Answers in Gene Simmons, posted 08-11-2007 9:16 AM Answers in Gene Simmons has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 116 of 160 (415691)
08-11-2007 3:52 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by riVeRraT
08-11-2007 3:01 PM


Re: And you wonder why no one can take you seriously.
Rat, are you going to demonstrate how Hillary is engaging in international prostitution?
quote:
That's already been done.
Really?
You have evidence that she's a madam in a brothel somewhere, perhaps?
Is she running a cartel that traffics in humans?
Is she offering $20 to blow some guy in a public restroom?
...oh, wait.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by riVeRraT, posted 08-11-2007 3:01 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 117 of 160 (415695)
08-11-2007 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by riVeRraT
08-11-2007 3:11 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
quote:
Also interesting was this quote:
"I have championed legislation that would create the first-ever coordinated research center devoted to revealing the impact of media on our children. This center would focus particularly on the impact of media on infants, an area that is widely not understood, and on the growing link between television viewing and childhood obesity."
From which you say there is no problem at all. So the politician you are sticking up for, goes against your own morals.
She is a threat to our constitution, according to your very own logic.
WTF are you talking about, rat?
When did I ever say it would be bad to do research on the impact of media on infants and the link between TV watching and childhood obesity?
What I am against is L E G I S L A T I O N that controls content.
She does not support censorship, but instead wishes to fund the research that would give parents the information they need to do their jobs as parents regarding the TV watching their children do.
It is remarkable how wrong you are, all the time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by riVeRraT, posted 08-11-2007 3:11 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by macaroniandcheese, posted 08-11-2007 11:26 PM nator has replied
 Message 120 by riVeRraT, posted 08-13-2007 5:48 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 118 of 160 (415750)
08-11-2007 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by Answers in Gene Simmons
08-10-2007 12:26 AM


quote:
So apparently, nobody has ever heard of Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton?
Sure, I've heard of them.
How are they hypocrites, exactly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Answers in Gene Simmons, posted 08-10-2007 12:26 AM Answers in Gene Simmons has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Taz, posted 08-13-2007 1:58 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 121 of 160 (415971)
08-13-2007 7:33 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by macaroniandcheese
08-11-2007 11:26 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
I'm not a particular supporter of Sen. Clinton, either.
It's just that Riverrat is talking a lot of bullshit about her.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by macaroniandcheese, posted 08-11-2007 11:26 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by macaroniandcheese, posted 08-13-2007 10:10 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 122 of 160 (415972)
08-13-2007 7:41 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by riVeRraT
08-13-2007 5:48 AM


Re: Hillary Clinton
quote:
And just what do you think that survey would be used for?
Parental guidelines?
Maybe to find out if there really is a bad effect on infants or if there isn't anything to be concerned with?
Oh, and are you going to provide evidence that Senator Clinton is a madam in a brothel, or heads an international prostitution cartel, or similar?
Remember, you claimed that she was participating in international prostitution.
Now it is time for you to support that claim or retract it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by riVeRraT, posted 08-13-2007 5:48 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by riVeRraT, posted 08-13-2007 12:44 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 126 of 160 (416039)
08-13-2007 1:38 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by riVeRraT
08-13-2007 12:44 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
Oh, and are you going to provide evidence that Senator Clinton is a madam in a brothel, or heads an international prostitution cartel, or similar?
quote:
Why should I? I didn't make that accusation, you did.
I asked you to provide evidence that Senator Clinton was personally involved in international prostitution.
You said that it had "already been done".
Please link to the post where you provided evidence to that effect or retract your claim that you have indeed shown that Clinton is directly involved in international prostitution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by riVeRraT, posted 08-13-2007 12:44 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by riVeRraT, posted 08-13-2007 6:21 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 129 of 160 (416049)
08-13-2007 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Taz
08-13-2007 1:58 PM


OK, I'll accept that is a hypocrite on the liberal side.
Sorry, I can't share your pain with seeing him on TV. I got rid of TV over a year ago and it has been wonderful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Taz, posted 08-13-2007 1:58 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Taz, posted 08-13-2007 5:48 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 132 of 160 (416115)
08-13-2007 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by Taz
08-13-2007 5:48 PM


quote:
Are you just agreeing with me because I'm on the liberal side? You seem to be very gungho on other cases of supposed liberal hypocrisy.
I wasn't agreeing with you, really, but with Answers in Gene Simmons.
But I was thinking...Does Jesse Jackson actually harp on about the sanctity of marriage and family values and stuff, and condemn adulterers specifically, or do you assume that he does becasue he's a preacher? I really don't know because I haven't paid him any attention in years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Taz, posted 08-13-2007 5:48 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Taz, posted 08-14-2007 12:34 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 133 of 160 (416116)
08-13-2007 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by riVeRraT
08-13-2007 6:21 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
OK, let me state it in the way you like it, since you insist upon trying to weasel about as much as possible to avoid correcting yourself.
I asked you to provide evidence that Senator Clinton was personally involved in international prostitution.
You said that it had already been done.
Please provide evidence that Clinton is personally involved in international prostitution or retract the claim.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by riVeRraT, posted 08-13-2007 6:21 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by riVeRraT, posted 08-14-2007 6:59 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 139 of 160 (416160)
08-14-2007 8:29 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by riVeRraT
08-14-2007 6:59 AM


Re: Hillary Clinton
quote:
If Hillary takes money to support her own agenda, from people who are well known to be involved in those things, doesn't that make her part of it?
No.
This has already been explained to you, back in message #86 by me:
But anyway, that's not the kind of hypocrisy we're talking about.
We are talking about a politician being caught engaging in activities they specifically try to pass legislation to ban or restrict, or that they particularly condemn.
Much more direct than "turning a blind eye", which was your example.
Clinton didn't engage in international prostitution.
...and also by Nuggin a couple of messages after that:
As near as I can tell, she opposed world wide prostitution (which I take to be forced prostitution, because I don't see her in Nevada trying to change their laws).
Meanwhile she takes money from people who are in the music industry who have some clients which include rap artists who have some songs which include the word "Hos".
I don't think I need to explain to you that there is a difference between "Pimps & Hos" of urban culture and young girls sold into sex slavery in Africa.
Are you actually saying that a US gansta rapper is [b]literally[/i] personally involved in the international sex slave trade?
Because he uses the word "hos" in his raps?
And that Clinton is literally personally involved in international prostitution because she took a contribution from a promoter who has many clients, one of which is a rapper who uses the word "hos"?
I guess that means that any politician who takes money from the American Family Institute that Ted Haggerd started must also be directly involved in gay prostitution and Methamhetamine use.
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by riVeRraT, posted 08-14-2007 6:59 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by riVeRraT, posted 08-14-2007 1:07 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 140 of 160 (416161)
08-14-2007 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by Taz
08-14-2007 12:34 AM


quote:
One doesn't need to condemn outright adulterers and then commit adultery to be a hypocrit.
Well yes, actually, you do.
Not living up to one's own religious standards is not hypocrisy. Sinning or making mistakes is not hypocrisy.
quote:
Unless Jesse Jackson is preaching some kind of weird-ass christian form of marriage, the fact that he's a preacher that has a whole second family makes him a hypocrit.
If you are going to call this hypocrisy, then your definition is way too broad. Worse, it isn't interesting.
If we use your definition, than every single Christian preachers are hypocrites, since all of them sin.
That's not interesting. The hypocrisy defined in the OP of someone being caught engaging in the specific and particular activity that they specifically and particularly condemn is very interesting.
As far as I know, Jackson didn't ever make a special point of railing against the evils of adultery.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Taz, posted 08-14-2007 12:34 AM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Taz, posted 08-14-2007 7:58 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 148 of 160 (416262)
08-14-2007 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by riVeRraT
08-14-2007 1:07 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
I guess that means that any politician who takes money from the American Family Institute that Ted Haggerd started must also be directly involved in gay prostitution and Methamhetamine use.
quote:
No....it means they support it then.
You can't even follow your own argument.
The above is your own argument plugged into a different example, rat.
But anyway, it is almost as asinine to suggest that a politician that accepted money from Haggerd's AFI supports meth-fuled sex with gay prostitutes as it is for you to suggest that Clinton accepting contributions from a producer who has a client who uses the word "hos" in his raps is tantamount to her being directly involved in international prostitution.
You have used the expression "fuck you" on this board, rat.
Therefore, you must be an advocate of rape.
See, I can play this game too!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by riVeRraT, posted 08-14-2007 1:07 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by riVeRraT, posted 08-14-2007 11:41 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 152 of 160 (416271)
08-14-2007 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by riVeRraT
08-14-2007 11:41 PM


Re: Hillary Clinton
If I told you that I knew someone who was directly involved in international prostitution, what kinds of things would pop into your mind?
What sorts of things would you suppose this person might do in relation to international prostitution?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by riVeRraT, posted 08-14-2007 11:41 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-15-2007 1:33 AM nator has replied
 Message 156 by riVeRraT, posted 08-15-2007 9:39 AM nator has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024