Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 58 (9175 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,617 Year: 4,874/9,624 Month: 222/427 Week: 32/103 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 11.0
AdminBuzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 301 of 304 (416251)
08-14-2007 10:37 PM
Reply to: Message 295 by PaulK
08-14-2007 2:13 AM


Re: AdminBuz in Exodus, merneptah Stele etc. thread
PaulK writes:
Jar can defend himself. But you have no valid ground for objecting to my pointing out the blatant falsehoods and misrepresentations that many creationists post. Again, if you were really interested in helping the creationist side you should be policing this sort of thing.
Pointing out's ok Paul, but there are times when you could to do so in a less caustic manner.
PaulK writes:
The fact that you were acting AGAINST balance probably has a lot to do with the lack of support.
Mayby so. I don't think so.
PaulK writes:
Moderation already favours the creationist side. It needs no correction.
It was Admin who saw the need for creo moderators.
PaulK writes:
And none of the other mods resurrect threads 12 days after the last post to make completely one-sided assessments. If the sides were reversed you would be complaining loudly about the unfair moderation. And for once you'd be right to do so.
Conceed. I should have paid more attention to time frame and let that one slide.
PaulK writes:
Anybody can set up a website. And citing a website doesn't mean that it supports IaJ's claims. You should know that. In the big fuss over your last departure you cited an idiotic website AND one which in fact contradicted you.
That's all subject to debate. No comment here.
PaulK writes:
Well, I would suggest using accurate and reliable websites instead. If the creationist can't find any then it's time for the intellectually honest creationist to reassess his position.
Likely relative to mindset. Again debatable.
Have a good evening. Hopefully that will wind up our discussion here.

For ideological balance on the EvC admin team as a Biblical creationist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 295 by PaulK, posted 08-14-2007 2:13 AM PaulK has not replied

Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4077 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 302 of 304 (416284)
08-15-2007 12:58 AM
Reply to: Message 297 by Admin
08-14-2007 10:40 AM


P+R and more
I`ll second that, Percy. We are definately spoiled at EvC with not only a great post and reply, but something as simple as showing the post position in a thread makes it so much easier to work out how far we have to trudge before thread`s end.
Ever thought of hiring your talents to other sites who have interesting conversations, but no indications of thread length or post position?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by Admin, posted 08-14-2007 10:40 AM Admin has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3977
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 303 of 304 (416290)
08-15-2007 1:23 AM


At 300+ messages, time for a new version
The new version is General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 12.0.
Closing this version in about 30 minutes, to permit any messages in progress.
Adminnemooseus

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1427 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 304 of 304 (416291)
08-15-2007 1:28 AM


(moved)
.
Edited by arachnophilia, : moved to new thread


Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024