Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,331 Year: 3,588/9,624 Month: 459/974 Week: 72/276 Day: 0/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Humor III
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2531 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 166 of 301 (416276)
08-15-2007 12:08 AM
Reply to: Message 165 by nator
08-14-2007 11:59 PM


Re: Lewis Black on creationism
the link doesn't work for me. not sure what's wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by nator, posted 08-14-2007 11:59 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by Doddy, posted 08-15-2007 1:57 AM kuresu has not replied

Doddy
Member (Idle past 5927 days)
Posts: 563
From: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 01-04-2007


Message 167 of 301 (416297)
08-15-2007 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 166 by kuresu
08-15-2007 12:08 AM


Re: Lewis Black on creationism
an extra '://' in the url
Just a moment...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by kuresu, posted 08-15-2007 12:08 AM kuresu has not replied

Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 168 of 301 (416315)
08-15-2007 6:51 AM


More Lewis Black
This seems like it may the lead up to the other one. The whole thing had me rolling, but the last bit is truly priceless Enjoy!

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 169 of 301 (418290)
08-27-2007 10:48 AM


The Onion
The Onion nailed it this time:
Woman Overjoyed By Giant Uterine Parasite
(Usually, I only find the headlines to be funny, but this time I laughed reading the entire article.)

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 753 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 170 of 301 (418295)
08-27-2007 11:05 AM


Jesus and Mo....
....with another kickass cartoon:
Jesus and Mo

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Phat, posted 08-27-2007 11:24 AM Coragyps has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18292
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 171 of 301 (418301)
08-27-2007 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 170 by Coragyps
08-27-2007 11:05 AM


Re: Jesus and Mo....
I could never see Jesus getting drunk like a mere human..as if He needed anything! Muhammad, however...now that guy liked his parties!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Coragyps, posted 08-27-2007 11:05 AM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by jar, posted 08-27-2007 11:29 AM Phat has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 412 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 172 of 301 (418304)
08-27-2007 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by Phat
08-27-2007 11:24 AM


Re: Jesus and Mo....
I could never see Jesus getting drunk like a mere human..as if He needed anything! Muhammad, however...now that guy liked his parties!
And your support for such a silly statement is? Perhaps you would like to start a thread on whether or not Muhammad liked to party and whether Jesus or Muhammad was more likely to get drunk.
Or maybe you might want to actually check tenets first?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Phat, posted 08-27-2007 11:24 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by Taz, posted 09-07-2007 1:07 PM jar has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3616 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 173 of 301 (418632)
08-29-2007 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
02-13-2007 7:27 PM


Q. What's the difference between a Hyundai sedan and a Jehovah's Witness?
A. You can close the door on a Jehovah's Witness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 02-13-2007 7:27 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1273 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 174 of 301 (418647)
08-29-2007 4:18 PM


Keith Olberman on the Miss Teen USA pageant
You gotta see it and hear it to believe it.
No webpage found at provided URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8QDlPX9Y3g

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by Zawi, posted 09-07-2007 11:00 AM subbie has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 175 of 301 (420272)
09-07-2007 7:02 AM


AdminPD, spammer?
She seems to be repeatedly posting the exact same message all over the place.
Example
Adminnemooseus

Zawi
Member (Idle past 3648 days)
Posts: 126
From: UK
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 176 of 301 (420300)
09-07-2007 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 174 by subbie
08-29-2007 4:18 PM


Re: Keith Olberman on the Miss Teen USA pageant
I reckon the girl in the video is making a clever post-modern commentary on the more subtle stupidity of people in general (well, not really but it's funny to imagine). By making herself sound like the caricature of dumb, she made herself an easy target for people who can only detect stupidity when it's packaged so conspicuously. These are the same people who are so gullible as to never even think to question the validity of a blatant pulled-out-the-ass statistic like "1 in 5 Americans can't find their own country on a world map". I'm pretty damn sure that 1 in 5 Americans aren't so stupid as to not know where their country is (I can't find any information about a poll that reveals such stats on the net), but they do seem to be stupid enough to get duped into believing any statistic they hear.
This isn't aimed at you btw Subbie. It's a good and funny vid.
Edited by Zawi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 174 by subbie, posted 08-29-2007 4:18 PM subbie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Modulous, posted 09-07-2007 11:54 AM Zawi has replied
 Message 182 by Minnemooseus, posted 09-07-2007 10:35 PM Zawi has not replied

Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 177 of 301 (420307)
09-07-2007 11:54 AM
Reply to: Message 176 by Zawi
09-07-2007 11:00 AM


Re: Keith Olberman on the Miss Teen USA pageant
What we need is evidence:
quote:
Nearly all (94%) young Americans can find the United States on the world map, and Canada
(92%) and Mexico (88%) are nearly as familiar. Wide majorities can find bordering bodies of
water including the Pacific Ocean (79%) and the Gulf of Mexico (75%). Trends from 2002
suggest that more young adults can pick out Canada and Mexico (with few signs of change for
other countries). However, it is concerning that one in ten of those with up to a high school
education cannot identify the U.S., and one in five cannot find the Pacific Ocean.
Places Beyond North America are Less Often Identified
Moving further abroad, three-quarters of young Americans can spot the distinctive landmass of
Australia (74%), and over half (56%) identify Brazil, the largest country by far in South America.
However, majorities cannot find the U.S.’s closest ally, the United Kingdom (36% correct, 65%
incorrect), nor can they find Egypt (30% vs. 70%) or Indonesia (25% vs. 75%).
Granted - this is just 18-24 year olds - but that should be reason to celebrate in itself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by Zawi, posted 09-07-2007 11:00 AM Zawi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by Zawi, posted 09-07-2007 12:50 PM Modulous has not replied
 Message 180 by Taz, posted 09-07-2007 1:11 PM Modulous has not replied

Zawi
Member (Idle past 3648 days)
Posts: 126
From: UK
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 178 of 301 (420322)
09-07-2007 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Modulous
09-07-2007 11:54 AM


Re: Keith Olberman on the Miss Teen USA pageant
Thanks for posting that. I was having difficulty finding such information on the net. It would be nice to thoroughly debunk the assertion that 1 in 5 Americans can't find their own country on a world map, but this helps.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Modulous, posted 09-07-2007 11:54 AM Modulous has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3310 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 179 of 301 (420328)
09-07-2007 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by jar
08-27-2007 11:29 AM


Re: Jesus and Mo....
He meant Muhammad Ali.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by jar, posted 08-27-2007 11:29 AM jar has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3310 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 180 of 301 (420330)
09-07-2007 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Modulous
09-07-2007 11:54 AM


Re: Keith Olberman on the Miss Teen USA pageant
Hahaha. This reminds me of an NPR news story I heard a couple years ago. At the time, educators in Indonesia were worried when their national standardize test showed that over 40-some percent of their high school students couldn't locate their own country on the map.
Added by edit. I heard it while driving for many hours on the road. And this was a couple years ago. So, my memory of this might not be as accurate as I'd like it to be. This information may not be correct!
Edited by Tazmanius Devilus, : No reason given.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Modulous, posted 09-07-2007 11:54 AM Modulous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by Zawi, posted 09-07-2007 1:24 PM Taz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024