Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Post your short questions here. No need to start a thread everytime.
Doddy
Member (Idle past 5910 days)
Posts: 563
From: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 01-04-2007


Message 277 of 304 (416627)
08-17-2007 1:57 AM
Reply to: Message 276 by Ihategod
08-17-2007 1:48 AM


Re: ......
I'd be glad to, Vashgun. I fancy myself as an educator, and so if you are willing to learn, I'm willing to teach. Have you a background in science?
Do you want to start a thread, or shall I?

Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today!
We seek contributors with a knowledge of Intelligent design to expand and review our page on this topic.
Registration not needed for editing most pages (the ID page is an exception), but you can register here!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by Ihategod, posted 08-17-2007 1:48 AM Ihategod has not replied

Doddy
Member (Idle past 5910 days)
Posts: 563
From: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 01-04-2007


Message 279 of 304 (416633)
08-17-2007 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 270 by Ihategod
08-16-2007 11:38 PM


Re: I might get nuked...
Vashgun writes:
Whilst reading many threads I have come to perhaps, a premature conclusion based on the review of the last few days. And that conclusion is that the majority of the users here and also the admins and mods are evolutionists.
This is true.
Vashgun writes:
It is as if all the creationists have either deserted or been blasted away by the mighty power of the Law of Evolution. I have seen only 3 creationists post, and subsequently many evolutionist attack the poster with disdain and arrogance more fitting a small child.
Rather, I assume it because rhetoric doesn't work too well in a forum setting. You need evidence.
Vashgun writes:
I however, did not come to read volumes of pages of previous debates and the few I read disgusted me due to the lack of debate prowess and ignorance presented mainly by the creation minded.
Aww, that's a shame. There are some real gems in those old threads. As for the creation minded being lacking in debate prowess, I would have to agree. In fact, this is one of the reasons for the creationists being so rare - they get banned because they can't debate sensibly and rationally, while following the few rules this site has.
Vashgun writes:
The lack of warmth and obvious monopoly coupled with the arrogance I since in every post leads me to the conclusion that this site is more an evolutionary think tank and not a open forum debate.
It is getting that way, yes. It's supposed to be a debate forum, but it is sliding towards complete one-sidedness. This doesn't suprise me for the same reasons as it may you, as I believe that evolution is the only acceptable scientific view. But it is a concern.
There is certainly a sense of arrogance in many of the evolutionists here. They've just had these debates so many times that they're getting tired and need a nap. Try to forgive them.

Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today!
We seek contributors with a knowledge of Intelligent design to expand and review our page on this topic.
Registration not needed for editing most pages (the ID page is an exception), but you can register here!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by Ihategod, posted 08-16-2007 11:38 PM Ihategod has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 280 by Nighttrain, posted 08-17-2007 3:03 AM Doddy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024