Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,838 Year: 4,095/9,624 Month: 966/974 Week: 293/286 Day: 14/40 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems of a different "Kind"
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5942 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 22 of 92 (418212)
08-26-2007 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Ihategod
08-26-2007 10:54 PM


The earth is old
Vashgun writes:
How about a link to your "evidence"?
Here are 101 reasons right here on evc
Message 1
There are others on the web.
vashgun writes:
I'll paraphrase from Hovind's class.
Hovind is a cheat and fraud (sorry there is no other way of putting it)
For those uninformed (or misinformed) the best evidence of an old earth I like to point out are angular unconformities. A fancy term for a very simple geological formation.
Reference Link writes:
1. Angular unconformities - Angular unconformities are where sediments are laid down in layers, then tilted and eroded, then new sediments are deposited on top. How does a global flood simultaneously deposit, tilt, and erode in the same exact place?
There is a long lost thread on this topic here
Message 1
If you have a good explanation for such a simple formation please post it in the above thread.
Another simple falsification of a young flooded earth are tree rings that exceed the supposed date of the flood. Read this thread for some good information.
Message 1(Simple and RAZD)[/color] in Forum The Great Debate)< !--UE-->

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Ihategod, posted 08-26-2007 10:54 PM Ihategod has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Ihategod, posted 08-27-2007 1:34 AM iceage has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024