Vashgun writes:
To you, creation is fantasy. To me, common descent is fantasy.
Does that mean to imply that to you, creation is not fantasy?
How is it that you can demand observation of our explanation, but yet ignore the fact that your observation is equally unobserved? That was Modulous's point.
Again, in response to Modulus's earlier post, you wrote:
Vashgun writes:
I haven't personally witnessed any type of "evolution" in or outside a laboratory.
But Modulus rightly pointed out that special creation also hasn't been observed inside or outside the lab.
Given that the event(s) that created humans must have occurred before any humans were around to see it, then is it not logical that any explanation for this event
must also be without direct observations to verify it?
There are no eyewitnesses, so can you stop demanding eyewitness accounts as the only acceptable form of evidence?
Edited by Doddy, : grammar
Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today!
What do you mean "You can't prove a negative"? Have you searched the whole universe for proofs of a negative statement? No? How do you know that they don't exist then?!