Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9178 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Anig
Upcoming Birthdays: Theodoric
Post Volume: Total: 918,106 Year: 5,363/9,624 Month: 388/323 Week: 28/204 Day: 4/24 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homosexuality and Natural Selection.
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2601 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 241 of 243 (415732)
08-11-2007 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by Hyroglyphx
08-04-2007 1:43 PM


Re: Arguments from science, not emotion
WK, there is only ONE way for evolution to take place. There is only ONE reason why a specie proliferates. There is only ONE way a mutation could be fixed in a population-
Right, and that would be the ability for the individual to reach reproductive age.
Oh wait, did you think it was something else?
You are taking basically a 5th grade interpretation of evolution and assuming that's all there is. This is incorrect.
It is true that sexual attractiveness is a big thing that natural selection selects for. It is also true that it is prehaps the most obvious thing.
However, you could be the sexiest damn beetle on the block, if you aren't immune to the local fungus, you aren't going to live long enough to strut your stuff.
Sexual attractiveness (or your ability to be attracted to people with whom you can have reproductive sex) is not the ONLY thing natural selection pays attention to.
Further, humans are deliberate breeders. We can choose when and with whom we have sex. Homosexuality is not a barrier to reproduction.
If you still believe that it is, I suggest you pick any right wing anti-gay legislator and see if he has kids. If he does, that's proof positive that gays can reproduce.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-04-2007 1:43 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Refpunk
Member (Idle past 6161 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 08-17-2007


Message 242 of 243 (419156)
09-01-2007 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by CDarwin
09-05-2006 9:36 PM


The fact is that none of us can help our sins. I can no more help my lust than homosexuals can help theirs which is precisely why Jesus's forgiveness is the ONLY solution to the sin problem.
So people can say; "it's in the genes" Or; "we got our desires from monkeys' or an imgaginary beast called the common ancestor" or any story they want to make up to suit their itching ears. But the fact remains that sin exists and there is no rememdy for it except Jesus Christ. Amen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by CDarwin, posted 09-05-2006 9:36 PM CDarwin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by pelican, posted 09-06-2007 2:31 AM Refpunk has not replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5094 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 243 of 243 (420080)
09-06-2007 2:31 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by Refpunk
09-01-2007 11:39 AM


Refpunk, is lust a sin?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by Refpunk, posted 09-01-2007 11:39 AM Refpunk has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024