|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 12.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
...but because when someone is rushing around dragging other threads off topic, it seems a good idea to give him one of his own, so he can get all of his obsessions off his chest... Seconded. I've suggested having an introductory forum before ... Besides I have a junkyard to dump on him. compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5936 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
You fellows are gluttons for punishment. Refpunk only knows a few pat phrases, clichés and will never discuss any details or evidence. He has not demonstrated any substance or provided any evidence that he has ever thought at any depth on these issues.
He is probably right now at a church bbq bragging to his mates just how he is slaying and confounding the evilutionist online with his razor wit and keen bible wisdom.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
You fellows are gluttons for punishment. Refpunk only knows a few pat phrases, clichés and will never discuss any details or evidence. He has not demonstrated any substance or provided any evidence that he has ever thought at any depth on these issues... Yes, and I have a name for such people. I call 'em "cat toys". What did you say that I was a glutton for?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2499 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
iceage writes: Refpunk only knows a few pat phrases, clichés and will never discuss any details or evidence. He has not demonstrated any substance or provided any evidence that he has ever thought at any depth on these issues. Right. He's a YEC, you're saying. We know that. There's no such thing as a YEC who's brought any substance to the issues we debate here, and a YEC who's thought at depth on these issues is a contradiction in terms. In depth thinking would make him into an ex-YEC. The reason that I suggested that he should have his own thread was so that he could rant away in one place, instead of dragging potentially interesting threads off topic. (Incidentally and off topic, the "prayer from Rob" post on your great debate thread was thoroughly enjoyable, and very much to the point).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1427 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Looks like his topic would have to be promoted to coffeehouse for him to participate. That would suit his inability to deal with reality eh?
http://EvC Forum: Miscellaneous Information -->EvC Forum: Miscellaneous Information compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
There's no such thing as a YEC who's brought any substance to the issues we debate here, and a YEC who's thought at depth on these issues is a contradiction in terms. In depth thinking would make him into an ex-YEC. Being representative of YEC as an admin and being your insolent remark was boarding closely to violation of the guidelines, I had to restrain myself from utilizing my admin mode here, but I decided your false and demeaning comment could slide this time and I'll just protest as member Buzsaw instead. Imo, you should climb down off your haughty high horse and acknowledge that in some areas we YECs have brought substance and yes, perhaps even to the point of debunking soundly some of the stuff some of you and yours do on this board.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iceage  Suspended Member (Idle past 5936 days) Posts: 1024 From: Pacific Northwest Joined: |
Bluegenes writes: The reason that I suggested that he should have his own thread was so that he could rant away in one place, instead of dragging potentially interesting threads off topic. Well looks like that is what happened. Nem called it the "Drunk Tank" - that is funny. Well lets see if he has more than one refrain (ie Unless you guys can breed a human from an ape you're loser's hah!)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
anglagard Member (Idle past 858 days) Posts: 2339 From: Socorro, New Mexico USA Joined: |
While I have little to dispute with your moderation style, which I usually find rather mild, I have a few questions concerning this post.
Buzsaw writes: Imo, you should climb down off your haughty high horse and acknowledge that in some areas we YECs have brought substance and yes, perhaps even to the point of debunking soundly some of the stuff some of you and yours do on this board. For example the term "we YECs" I thought you were a YCC? Is the topic concerning your stand still open so you could clarify? Also, do you have any examples of this "debunking soundly some of the stuff some of you and yours do on this board?" This thread is of course the inappropriate place to continue this discussion but I would like to know what you may consider when and where YECs have come even remotely anywhere close to overthrowing the natural sciences as I am unfamiliar with anything of substance. Once again, would you be willing to clarify your position in the appropriate venue? Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2499 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Buzsaw writes: Being representative of YEC as an admin and being your insolent remark was boarding closely to violation of the guidelines, I had to restrain myself from utilizing my admin mode here, but I decided your false and demeaning comment could slide this time and I'll just protest as member Buzsaw instead. Which of the guidelines did you have in mind? If it's the "don't make bare assertions" one, it doesn't really apply, because EvC members see the evidence which backs up my points all the time, so there's no need to give examples. I stand by my comments. There's truth in them, so there's no insolence.
Imo, you should climb down off your haughty high horse and acknowledge that in some areas we YECs have brought substance and yes, perhaps even to the point of debunking soundly some of the stuff some of you and yours do on this board. IMO, that does break the "bare assertions" guideline. I think you should back it up by starting a thread on which you could give examples of YEC posts which bring substance to the debate. I could do the same for evolutionists, if you want, but that would be so easy as to be pointless, because real scientific information comes into the framework all the time. As for debunking stuff, feel free to make a list of what's been debunked on your new "YEC substance" thread. I'd be genuinely interested to know.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Personal position = YCC.
Admin position = YEC representation YEC at EvC has pretty much been a coverall coloquialism pertaining to all Biblical fundamentalists, so don't be surprised when it's applied to me, especially in my administrative role. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPD Inactive Administrator |
1. This thread is for "General Discussion of Moderation Procedures.
2. There is a thread to discuss PNTs: Considerations of topic promotions from the Proposed New Topics Forum Please keep discussions in the appropriate thread and refrain from discussing nonmoderator behavior in this thread. Thank you
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17825 Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
In the Angelic and Demonic Perceptions thread AdminBuz is complaining that he thought that the topic was intended to refer only to demons (and maybe fallen angels).
quote: But the first half of the OP is about the "good guys". So surely references to them are to be expected and are as relevant to the OP as discussion of demons are. So why the concern ? I would also add that I personally see nothing wrong with dealing with both in a single thread.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: |
There was (as PaulK/AdminPaul already knows) a fair amount of discussion of this matter, in the "Private Administration Forum", more or less concluding here.
AdminBuzzsaw has posted his summary here, at the "Angelic and Demonic Possessions" topic. Case closed. Adminnemooseus
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2663 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Jazzns asks:
Has anyone considered.... ....that what we have here is a Troll? I know the acceptance level is high here on this board for what we believe people to be capable of retaining a large amount of "the crazy". But common, a UFO believing creationist? I admit I could be wrong. But reading this thread really raises my suspicion a little bit. I'm afraid I must agree. Angels cruising around in UFOs?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
Not that I'm asking to be suspended myself, but there were several of us contributing to the abuse of the POTM. Any reason why Rob and iceage got singled out?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024