sidelined writes:
No problem there because we can just as easily say {via Occam's razor} that the universe was also uncaused.
But the designer isn't explaining the universe. It is explaining 'specified complexity', specifically that of living organisms.
This is true, but they don't so much care about meaning or predictions. It just has to be shown to be true enough to be an alternative to evolution.
Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today!
What do you mean "You can't prove a negative"? Have you searched the whole universe for proofs of a negative statement? No? How do you know that they don't exist then?!