Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Yoda Thread
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3598 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 1 of 49 (421130)
09-11-2007 5:39 AM


My thread this is. Any subject welcome here is. But talk like Yoda you must.
Start things off we will. Mmmm. Yes.
The Wedge Document this is. But now talks like Yoda it does. Mmmm.

A bedrock principle of civilization it is, that human beings created in the image of God must be. Evidence all around us there is: democracy, rights, enterprise, progress in arts and sciences. God-like beings are we, not some crude matter.
Yet wholesale attack on this there was, by intellectuals from the dark side. Used modern science they did. Yes. Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, and Sigmund Freud the Republic betrayed. Human beings not moral and spiritual, said they, but animals and machines must be. A universe by impersonal forces ruled saw they. A materialistic conception of reality they held. Yes.
Today has the dark side every area of culture infested. Spawned a virulent strain of materialism it has. Yes. Coercive government programs created it has. Heaven on earth falsely promise they do. Mmmm.
Now your turn it is. Do, or do not. There is no try.
____
Archer
Transitional all species are. Yes.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 09-11-2007 10:51 AM Archer Opteryx has replied
 Message 4 by Coragyps, posted 09-11-2007 12:41 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied
 Message 5 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-11-2007 1:37 PM Archer Opteryx has replied
 Message 6 by jar, posted 09-11-2007 3:00 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied
 Message 8 by anastasia, posted 09-11-2007 8:36 PM Archer Opteryx has replied
 Message 43 by Phat, posted 12-23-2007 10:10 AM Archer Opteryx has replied
 Message 45 by Archer Opteryx, posted 01-29-2008 1:56 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied
 Message 46 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-06-2008 4:02 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied
 Message 49 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-16-2008 1:54 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 49 (421158)
09-11-2007 10:39 AM


Thread here now moved from the Proposed New Topics forum. Discuss it we will. (Yes)
Edited by AdminPhat, : Yodafied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18262
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 3 of 49 (421162)
09-11-2007 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
09-11-2007 5:39 AM


Topic Must Be, Hmmmm?
Archer, what, talk about, shall we, hmm? Dialogue all his own, this character we call Yoda seems to have!
Discuss the spirituality that we all so desperately seek, perhaps we can!
YodaSpeak
-----------------------------------------------------------
Very different from intentions, convictions are. To do, convictions are something God gives us that we have. Things that we ought to do, intentions are, but with them we never follow through. .
* * * * * * * * * *.
“Achieved brilliance without wisdom, the world has, power without conscience. World of nuclear giants and ethical infants, ours is.”--General Omar Bradley
Edited by Phat, : YodaSpeak
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-11-2007 5:39 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-12-2007 2:52 PM Phat has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 734 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 4 of 49 (421186)
09-11-2007 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
09-11-2007 5:39 AM


Stupid is your argument. TFSU you shuold.
--- found yesterday on Urban Dictionary
Edited by Coragyps, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-11-2007 5:39 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-11-2007 4:40 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 17 by Chiroptera, posted 09-12-2007 3:33 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 5 of 49 (421197)
09-11-2007 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
09-11-2007 5:39 AM


getting married i am. the fifth of april.
the shoes i will be wearing, arrived they did today.
shantung in green they are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-11-2007 5:39 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2007 6:51 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 6 of 49 (421210)
09-11-2007 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
09-11-2007 5:39 AM


yodasan writes:
The beginning of humanity, the feeling of commiseration is; the beginning of righteousness, the feeling of shame and dislike is; the beginning of propriety, the feeling of deference and compliance is; and the beginning of wisdom, the feeling of right and wrong is.
To you say “when all those near, man of talents and worth, 'this is,' you may therefore believe it not. When your great officers all say, man of talents and virtue, 'this is,' for that believe it neither may you. When all the people say, man of talents and virtue, 'this is,' then look into the case, and such, when you find that the man is, employ him.” . Yeesssssss.
Edited by jar, : No reason given.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-11-2007 5:39 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 7 of 49 (421233)
09-11-2007 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Coragyps
09-11-2007 12:41 PM


Should that not "UTFS" be?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Coragyps, posted 09-11-2007 12:41 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-12-2007 2:35 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5953 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 8 of 49 (421278)
09-11-2007 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
09-11-2007 5:39 AM


The Picture of Yoda Gray
The creator of beautiful things, the artist is. To reveal art and conceal the artist, art's aim is. He who can translate into another manner or a new material his impression of beautiful things, the critic is.
The highest as the lowest form of criticism, a mode of autobiography is. Those who find ugly meanings in beautiful things corrupt are, and charming not. A fault, this is.
Those who find beautiful meanings in beautiful things, the cultivated are. For these, hope there is. They to whom beautiful things mean only beauty, elect are.
Such thing as a moral or an immoral book, there is not. Books well written are, or badly written. All, that is.
Edited by anastasia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-11-2007 5:39 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by kuresu, posted 09-11-2007 8:47 PM anastasia has replied
 Message 23 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2007 1:12 PM anastasia has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2513 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 9 of 49 (421285)
09-11-2007 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by anastasia
09-11-2007 8:36 PM


Re: The Picture of Yoda Gray
"and charming not", should it be.
There, have I spoken.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by anastasia, posted 09-11-2007 8:36 PM anastasia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by anastasia, posted 09-11-2007 10:24 PM kuresu has not replied

  
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5953 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 10 of 49 (421299)
09-11-2007 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by kuresu
09-11-2007 8:47 PM


Re: The Picture of Yoda Gray
kuresu writes:
"and charming not", should it be.
A fault, this was.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by kuresu, posted 09-11-2007 8:47 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3598 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 11 of 49 (421399)
09-12-2007 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Dr Adequate
09-11-2007 4:40 PM


MAOL am I.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-11-2007 4:40 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3598 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 12 of 49 (421402)
09-12-2007 2:52 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
09-11-2007 10:51 AM


many questions have we
Phat: Discuss the spirituality that we all so desperately seek, perhaps we can!
A deep matter this is. Many questions have we, mmm? The existence of the Force--prove this can we? Life in galaxies far far away--exist does it? If Banthas from Tantans evolved, why Tantans extinct are not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 09-11-2007 10:51 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by arachnophilia, posted 09-12-2007 3:04 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1344 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 13 of 49 (421403)
09-12-2007 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Archer Opteryx
09-12-2007 2:52 PM


Re: many questions have we
If Banthas from Tantans evolved, why Tantans extinct are not?
spelled "tauntaun" it is, and on different worlds they live. (and badly phrased that was)
Edited by arachnophilia, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-12-2007 2:52 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2007 1:10 PM arachnophilia has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3291 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 14 of 49 (421404)
09-12-2007 3:07 PM


Annoying to read this thread is.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-12-2007 3:19 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 16 by arachnophilia, posted 09-12-2007 3:19 PM Taz has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3598 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 15 of 49 (421407)
09-12-2007 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Taz
09-12-2007 3:07 PM


More style now your signature has.

A Disclaimer This Is:
To deficiency of the English language occasionally owing, he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her have I used in order awkwardness of style to avoid. Yes.
He, him, and his not as masculine pronouns exclusively are intended. To either or both sexes these may refer. Mmmm.
By those species having nine sexes instead of two, we hope no offence taken is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Taz, posted 09-12-2007 3:07 PM Taz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024