Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   People - I /was/ a Christian
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 142 of 307 (421418)
09-12-2007 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by crashfrog
09-10-2007 3:34 PM


Re: I know about Faith
People - I was a Christian. A fundamentalist, creationist one. Biblical inerrancy. Redeeming power of Jesus. Gave my life to Christ.
All that stuff. I've been there, people. I do know, truly, what you speak of, White Guy. I was all wrapped up in it - which is how I know that it's fake and you're fooling yourself.
I was perhaps the opposite of you. I saw no good reason to believe in God. I modeled after Sen. Jess Ventura's declaration when he said, "Religion is a crutch for the weak."
In fact, just about all the anti-theistic arguments made in here were on my lips only a few years ago. Heck, I was so proud of the notion that a lifelong memorial is adorned on my body to this day-- a crucifix with a banner streaming from the horizontal beam containing the word, "Agnostic," along with an illuminated all-seeing eye, representative of the Almighty.
Of course virtually all of my friends were absolutely flabbergasted that me, of all people, would have ended up writing books on the subject and going to Bible college. Most of them took it well, however, to this day, there is slight apprehension on their part. Its palpable.
But I can't help what happened to me. Nor could I explain that which is totally ineffable and indescribable. Its almost maddening to be that close to something only to have those around you incapable of wrapping their mind around the concept.
As for you Crash, I have tremendous hope for you. I think you are always teetering on the cusp of revival. And your hiatus may be understood in greater detail after some introspection.
I wish that very much for you. Naturally, you might scoff at such a notion because it would tacitly assert that you are wrong about something. Obviously no one desires to be ignorant of anything. But I mean it in a kind way. I hope you take well to the sentiment. If nothing else, I am wishing you well on your journey.
And perhaps though you think I'm horribly deluded, maybe, just maybe, you wish the same of me-- that I would snap back in to reality. Maybe in some small way we wish the best for one another despite the controversial arguments that have uncovered a rift.
Senator Ventura's argument to some degree still rings true in many ways. But another quote rings even truer for me.
"A little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men’s minds about to religion." -Francis Bacon

"I love those who can smile in trouble, who can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but they whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves their conduct, will pursue their principles unto death." -Leonardo da Vinci

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by crashfrog, posted 09-10-2007 3:34 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by nator, posted 09-12-2007 6:12 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 151 by crashfrog, posted 09-12-2007 6:32 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 307 (421557)
09-13-2007 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by nator
09-12-2007 6:12 PM


Re: I know about Faith
Guess which group is more attractive to me?
What on earth does this have to do with the topic, or more specifically, what I wrote?

"I love those who can smile in trouble, who can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but they whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves their conduct, will pursue their principles unto death." -Leonardo da Vinci

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by nator, posted 09-12-2007 6:12 PM nator has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 183 of 307 (421560)
09-13-2007 7:29 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by crashfrog
09-12-2007 6:32 PM


Re: I know about Faith
The natural result of that is that I'm always on the very cusp of being shown to be completely wrong in whatever I previously believed. That's what it means to be a rational person.
And, of course, that's the farthest thing in the world from being a person of faith.
I think faith is a word that has had endure a horribly mangled definition. It seems those of the anti-theist persuasion believe that in order to have faith, one must come to a conclusion based soley on a blind faith-- that one can't reach logical conclusions about it. I think that is totally false from a Judeo-Christian point of view.
No one should just assume God for the sake of assuming God. That isn't faith to me. That sounds more like wishful thinking. There are innumerable reasons why I believe as I do. Must I ultimately extend that to faith? Yes, of course. Indeed God is very clear that a measure of faith is necessary, even vital. But this must first derive from an informed faith.
It's possible, however unlikely, that I might be convinced by evidence to believe in God again; but I don't imagine I could ever in this universe become a person of faith, except as a great personal failing.
If you came to a faith-based decision based on nothing but faith itself, then we are in agreement.
If there's one thing that I wish for you, in this subject and all others, it's that you'll come to regard yourself as the least trustworthy authority on these issues, rather than the greatest, as you seem to, now. I'm sure you'll misunderstand what I mean, but a reasonable person - rather than a person of faith - would find their personal, irrefutable feelings of communion with God to be an even greater reason to be skeptical of the existence of God - not proof of God.
I think some skepticism is an important aspect of faith. I would say that all good Christians should grapple with God. But whenever something trips me up and I can't currently wrap my mind around the concept, at some point I always find the answer eventually. Usually when that happens, its indicative of a lack of understanding on my part.
There is only one question that I've never received an answer to. And that's why God would have chosen physical life at all, as opposed to the spiritual. There is no scriptual basis, that I am aware of, that explains why He created life in the physical at all. I'm still mystified by this question.

"I love those who can smile in trouble, who can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but they whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves their conduct, will pursue their principles unto death." -Leonardo da Vinci

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by crashfrog, posted 09-12-2007 6:32 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by nator, posted 09-13-2007 9:03 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 190 by crashfrog, posted 09-13-2007 1:15 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 184 of 307 (421570)
09-13-2007 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 160 by arachnophilia
09-12-2007 11:36 PM


Re: Biblical Fundamentalist
every chance to insult islam, huh buz?
nevermind that suicide is forbidden by the quran. they find a way around it just like christian fundamentalists find ways around what their book actually says. i don't think the book itself is much of a standard -- fundamentalism seems to do more with dogma and systems of belief than any holy text.
In many ways that is true, which no doubt is why there is an argument concerning what actually constitutes "Fundamentalism." The word is now ambiguous.
But I agree with Buzsaw here, that a fundamentalist Christian is someone who steadfastly promotes the gospel as it was presented. Of course, like most things, it opens the door to private interpretation. We all know that cults of various flavours rear their ugly head from these kinds of interpretations. Wahhabi Islam is no different in this aspect, as you've shared.
The sad thing that I see is people using that as some sort of evidentiary claim that Christianity itself is inherently wrong. To which I reply: Well, is that evidence of Christ being wrong, or of some His followers who manipulated His words for their own gain?
We don't base Christianity on other Christians who are every bit as fallible as any other human being-- rather we base it on Christ alone who uncovers those faults. Indeed, I echo Paul's sentiments here when he said that if anyone brings to you another gospel other than the one presented to you by Yeshua, then let it be anathema.
What people love to do is point out how some avowed Christian says or does something counter to their own ascribed theology, only to bring the whole of Christendom in to ill-repute. That kind of reasoning is flawed, as it only serves to confirm that the people espousing it are wrong, not the doctrine itself.
Its only been in the last decade that the term "fundy" was representative of a legalist. But there does not seem to be consensus concerning the word.

"I love those who can smile in trouble, who can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but they whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves their conduct, will pursue their principles unto death." -Leonardo da Vinci

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by arachnophilia, posted 09-12-2007 11:36 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by nator, posted 09-13-2007 9:06 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 188 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-13-2007 10:50 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 189 by Archer Opteryx, posted 09-13-2007 12:20 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 198 by PaulK, posted 09-13-2007 4:43 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 203 by dwise1, posted 09-13-2007 8:36 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 201 of 307 (421681)
09-13-2007 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by nator
09-13-2007 9:03 AM


Re: I know about Faith
The thing that most believers are not aware of, though, is the very strong human ability to deceive ourselves through various sorts of bias and selective thinking.
Yes, to a large extent I think that afflicts the lot of us, theistic and atheistic alike. But that doesn't mean that everyone lives in a constant state of delusion either. We're all subject to personal biases whether we like it or not. The objective, I suppose, is objectivity itself.

"I love those who can smile in trouble, who can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but they whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves their conduct, will pursue their principles unto death." -Leonardo da Vinci

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by nator, posted 09-13-2007 9:03 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by nator, posted 09-13-2007 11:05 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 214 of 307 (421790)
09-14-2007 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by nator
09-13-2007 9:06 AM


Re: Biblical Fundamentalist
quote:
What people love to do is point out how some avowed Christian says or does something counter to their own ascribed theology, only to bring the whole of Christendom in to ill-repute. That kind of reasoning is flawed, as it only serves to confirm that the people espousing it are wrong, not the doctrine itself.
So when Buz condemns all Muslims for the behavior of a minority, you should be right there, correcting him and telling him that he's wrong, every time.
Right?
Funny that I don't remember you doing that.
Probably because I've never seen Buz condemn all Muslims. I've seen him criticize those who are hypocritical and I've seen him speak out against Islam over its religious veracity-- all of which I do too.

"I love those who can smile in trouble, who can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but they whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves their conduct, will pursue their principles unto death." -Leonardo da Vinci

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by nator, posted 09-13-2007 9:06 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by nator, posted 09-14-2007 9:46 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 215 of 307 (421797)
09-14-2007 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by macaroniandcheese
09-13-2007 10:50 AM


Re: More Misuse of the Word Wahabbi
you have no idea what wahhabism means. it is not the arabic word for fundamentalism.
I never said, nor implied, that Wahhabism was the Arabic word for fundamentalism, so I'm not sure what you're objection is.

"It is better to shun the bait, than struggle in the snare." -Ravi Zacharias

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-13-2007 10:50 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-14-2007 2:53 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 218 of 307 (421803)
09-14-2007 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by macaroniandcheese
09-14-2007 2:53 PM


Re: More Misuse of the Word Wahabbi
you keep using it wrongly, including describing people from iran and iraq WHERE THER ARE NO WAHHABIS.
Brenna, since this is now getting off topic, this will be my last transmission in this vein.
My usage of Wahhabism was merely for juxtaposing and paralleling, not for discussing at length. Should you like to discuss at length, start a new topic.
Lastly, Al-Qaeda models itself after Wahhabist beliefs, which tends towards extreme interpretations of Islam. Al Qaeda is in Iraq. Many Iranians hold a similar ideology. Therefore, it renders your point moot, as there is nothing wrong with the description in the context I used it in.

"It is better to shun the bait, than struggle in the snare." -Ravi Zacharias

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-14-2007 2:53 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by macaroniandcheese, posted 09-14-2007 3:21 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024