Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   People - I /was/ a Christian
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4039
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.2


Message 23 of 307 (421026)
09-10-2007 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by jar
09-10-2007 5:16 PM


Re: Amen brothers!
I was raised as a fairly conservative Christian, but there was never any real insistence on Biblical literalism. My parents always declined to engage in any sort of debate. I was the one who proposed such non-literal interpretations and acted as the apologist in the family. The rest of my family believe in literalism, but accepted my interpretations so long as I still believed Jesus died for my sins. These are the beliefs I held when I actually joined this site.
I still became an Atheist. My deconversion was caused by the critical thinking skills I picked up on this site and others, and examining the problems of logic in my own reasons for believing. The book Misquoting Jesus helped clear out the last vestiges of faith in anything dependant on the Bible. I basically realized that the only reason I was Christian was because I had been raised that way. I realized that the Bible was so riddles with translation errors, contradiction, and based entirely on the cherry-picking of books to be included in the first place that it was a poor basis for my life. I actually read the Bible with a critical eye, and noticed for the first time all of the horrific violence and disgusting content they gloss over in church, or even (as with the Revelation) try to paint the eternal torment of billions of people as a good thing. And then I realized the only reason I remained a Christian was becasue I wanted God to exist. Since there was no reason other than my desire to actually believe, parsimony dictated that I discard the extraneous entity.
So for me, an environment that was at least tolerant of non-literal interpretations and apologetics made no real difference at all.

Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 09-10-2007 5:16 PM jar has not replied

Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4039
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 8.2


Message 258 of 307 (422129)
09-15-2007 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by Cold Foreign Object
09-13-2007 9:56 PM


Re: Runaway Frog
Whoever the evolutionists condemn are the most right, this is invulnerable logic.
I condemn Hitler, Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, Fred Phelps, every member of the KKK, neo-Nazis, other racists and bigots of all types, murderers, rapists, thieves, President Bush, and bad drivers. And more, but I dont feel like typing it all out.
I'm an evolutionist.

Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-13-2007 9:56 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-16-2007 6:04 PM Rahvin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024