Proof for God's Non-existance?

But we have only the claims made by the authors (unknown) of the stories. There is no provenance. Nonsense. Public records are only valuable when they can be independently verified. They MUST have a provenance.By your criteria the tale of Ahmad ibn Fadlan and the wendol carries the same authority.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

LOLNonsense. If you look you will find that everyone of them DOES have a provenance. Each of those you mentioned requires independent verification, so Judge, Doctor, Recorder, Lawyer or Inspector must sign off on them, independently confirming their veracity. LOL.Right, we need to evaluate them based on external evidence.That is what you have never presented.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Sorry but all you seem to be doing is trying to palm the pea in the hope that no one notices.In reference to historical records I said

quote:

---

Right, we need to evaluate them based on external evidence. That is what you have never presented.

---

To which your replied: I'm sorry but that is a silly, irrelevant, incorrect, contradictory and misrepresentative paragraph all at once. I would not have thought that possible. No, of course not. That is why I said that you check its validity by testing it against outside evidence, external material.It is that outside evidence, that external material that you have NEVER presented. Whether or not a record is preserved is irrelevant. The fact that some record is there tells us nothing about whether or not it is factual. You even go on and point out exactly what I have been saying all along, to wit: Outside evidence, external material, those things which can be tested to determine the possible validity of a document.It is that outside evidence, the external material, that you have never presented.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Um, no it is not. Public records are vetted, notarized, signed off by an inspector, a judge, a doctor, a coroner. Um, no. The fact that we exist today is evidence that we exist today. It in no way validates much else. Not at all. I say we can and have tested the validity of the "Bible" (as though such a thing as "The Bible" even existed) and it has been shown to be inaccurate on many historical issues.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Not at all. But their validity is tested against outside evidence, external material, and that is what you have never produced.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Um, yes. LOLMany fables and many authors have claimed that some god did something or the other.So far no evidence has been presented to support such claims.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

I'm sorry but the validity of any claim is based on testing that claim against outside evidence and external material.And that is what you have never produced.You have never produced any evidence that the so called "entity" exists or the the so called "entity" even made such a claim.All you have presented is evidence that the authors of stories made the claim that such an "entity exists" and that "the entity made such a claim".

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

False. You have presented no evidence that God exists or that God created the heavens and the earth.The fact that the earth exists is only evidence that the earth exists.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

You are still trying to misdirect the audiences attention while you change the topic.You have asserted that some entity claimed to have created the universe.So far you have still never presented any evidence that that such an entity exists or that such an entity made such a claim.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

You have still failed to present any evidence that God exists or that God made such a claim.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

That is irrelevant. We have claims that fairies exist and that James Bond exists. Again, irrelevant. Claims themselves are worthless unless supported by confirming external material and outside evidence.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Still more false assertions. You are still just making totally false assertion. No we do not "all know the claims were cross referenced by others and in harmony with external evidence(historical)" and we also know that many of the so called historical incidents in the so called Bible are simply false.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

But anyone can confirm that his fridge is full of atoms.That is not true of your assertion.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

No, but knowledge has evolved. For example, when we were more ignorant it was reasonable to think that the Bible was an accurate history. Now we know that much of what is reported in the various Bible stories are simply factually wrong.As we learn more knowledge evolves.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

The Flood, 6 Day Creation, GOE, Exodus, Flood, Conquest of Canaan ... for starters.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion