Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,869 Year: 4,126/9,624 Month: 997/974 Week: 324/286 Day: 45/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Questions for William Dembski
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6039 days)
Posts: 571
From: New Hampshire, USA
Joined: 07-28-2001


Message 28 of 31 (422940)
09-18-2007 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by taylor_31
09-18-2007 1:27 PM


quote:
It seemed to me to be a sexed-up version of Paley's watchmaker argument,
Ding ding ding! You win the prize! Actually, it's considerably less sexy; the eye (Paley's fave example) is much cooler and easier to talk about than blood clotting cascades.
quote:
and that the scientist had only added "two more islands between Los Angeles and Tokyo".
And here Dembski tips his hand completely as a "God of the Gaps" proponent. Of course, he starts by maintaining there were NOT any islands between L.A. and Tokyo...but when shown to be wrong, he now says that every intervening step just creates more gaps, the classic "God of the Gaps" response.
As a side note, the "L.A. to Tokyo" schtick is an interesting rhetorical choice on his part, because we know there are wide expanses of ocean between the real L.A. and Tokyo. He could just as easily have chosen Key West and Florida, but that wouldn't bias people's intuitions nearly as much, would it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by taylor_31, posted 09-18-2007 1:27 PM taylor_31 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024