IaJ writes:
The 'evidences' for speech is not what has been proposed by evolutionists, and evidences are available to show if speech was prevalent - or NOT.
You're not actually talking about speech, you're talking about written language. I'm writing now, but I'm not speaking. No one requires written language in order to speak. Children speak long before they read and write.
Written language is a technological tool. Many known cultures with complex spoken languages do not use written language. Implying that the earliest written languages have anything to do with the first human speech is like saying humans could not move around before they had invented the wheel, or could not farm before they had invented the tractor.
Chimps can cry "hey, food here" and "hey, good food here" to each other. Because you can't speak Chimpish, like you can't speak Chinese, doesn't mean they can't understand things from each other's cries. Some experts reckon them to have the verbal communication equivalent of 100 words.
For our species, complex speech is an inbuilt biological thing, and bear in mind that skulls like yours and mine have been found that have been dated at more than 150,000 years old.
Like us, these people had a well developed "Broca's Area".
Broca's area - Wikipedia
They certainly spoke to each other, without writing. Just as certainly as they moved around without wheels.