Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Holistic Doctors, and medicine
Asgara
Member (Idle past 2330 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 271 of 304 (424209)
09-26-2007 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 269 by Kitsune
09-26-2007 8:41 AM


Re: Linus Pauling
My daughter and I have been taking more vitamin C than this for 2 years and it has never been a problem. Nor has it been when my husband is taking it. They're quite simply wrong.
I was on Prozac for several years, my best friend was on Paxil for several years and neither one of us had any problems. In fact I credit the drug for getting my life back on track. Your ND is quite simply wrong.
Do you see how your argument is flawed?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Kitsune, posted 09-26-2007 8:41 AM Kitsune has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by Kitsune, posted 09-26-2007 9:52 AM Asgara has replied

Asgara
Member (Idle past 2330 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 275 of 304 (424222)
09-26-2007 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 274 by Kitsune
09-26-2007 9:52 AM


Re: Antidepressants
I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say. I was throwing your exact method of argument back at you. Your point was that since you, your daughter and your husband take megadoses of C with no problems that the medical establishment was "simply wrong." I simply did the same thing, stating that my experience showed you to be "simply wrong."
Side effects do not happen across the board and the effect that the drug is being prescribed for do not happen across the board. There are going to be those that a drug helps and those that it doesn't. There will be those that feel no effects and those that have every side effect possible happen to them.
This is why argument by anecdote is not convincing. The convincing issue is what percentage of those taking a particular drug experience relief, what percentage are harmed. What is the risk / benefit equation? These statistics are just not available for most alternative options as they have not been tested and are not regulated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by Kitsune, posted 09-26-2007 9:52 AM Kitsune has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by Kitsune, posted 09-26-2007 10:18 AM Asgara has not replied

Asgara
Member (Idle past 2330 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 277 of 304 (424225)
09-26-2007 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 273 by Kitsune
09-26-2007 9:31 AM


Re: A Few Comments
The mainstream is not interested. Look at what happened to Pauling. He won a Nobel Prize for his work on vitamin C. There should have been much more research done after this
Just a small nitpick. Linus Pauling did not win a Nobel Prize for his work on Vitamin C.
His Nobel Prize in Chemistry was for his work describing the nature of chemical bonds.
There was more research into vitamin C after Pauling. That is how we know that megadoses can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, flushing of the face, headache, fatigue, disturbed sleep and rashes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by Kitsune, posted 09-26-2007 9:31 AM Kitsune has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by Kitsune, posted 09-26-2007 10:20 AM Asgara has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024