Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,835 Year: 4,092/9,624 Month: 963/974 Week: 290/286 Day: 11/40 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God as Artist
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 14 of 32 (424956)
09-29-2007 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Raphael
09-29-2007 4:54 AM


Actually, he made almost everything in the universe for a purpose(spiders eat flies ...)
And flies, by a wise and beneficient purpose, are there to feed the spiders.
It all makes perfect sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Raphael, posted 09-29-2007 4:54 AM Raphael has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 15 of 32 (424957)
09-29-2007 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
04-01-2007 3:32 PM


Life is a work of art. The universe is a work of art.
Oh, I proved that ages ago. It's one of those breakthroughs in Intelligent Design Theory that you never see reported in the evil atheist media.
Dr Adequate writes:
* Adopts ID pose, dons Magical Hat of Analogy, says the mystic occult words "Petitio principii!" *
Designed objects fall into two categories. First, there are those which are useful. Now the Earth and its ecosystem are not evidently in use. Moreover, so far as we are aware, no design theorist has ever even postulated a use that the Designer (or the Owner) might have for a life-bearing planet, still less shown positive evidence that it has one.
What is it supposed to be for, after all? Is it a manufactory? A conveyance? A utensil? It seems ill-adapted for any purpose.
Experience teaches us that when an object is well designed, but has no practical purpose, it is intended to be ornamental. The Earth, we know, is well-designed. From the fact that the Earth has no conceivable use, it follows that the Earth must fall into the second category. The Earth must be an ornament, a decoration, a work of art.
Hence we have a strong and testable prediction: that the Earth should, in fact, be ornamental. Now the Earth, I think everyone will conceed, is quite stunningly beautiful; and it is noteworthy that the principal exceptions are those parts which have been modified by humanity for practical purposes. Similarly, all our experience teaches us that the most highly ornamental objects are never intended for practical purposes.
To summarize our findings: the Earth has no apparent use; it is evidently highly ornamental; hence it is an ornament.
This deduction is in line with other sciences which deal with the study of design, such as archaeology. If an archaeologist were to unearth an item which was evidently designed, which showed no signs of use, had no conceivable practical use, and was unarguably very beautiful, then that archaeologist would classify it as ornamental in function.
---
I wonder how many other people in the Wonderful Scientific World Of ID have come to this conclusion? I wonder how much ink has been expended over this point?
I wonder ... and I can guess.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 04-01-2007 3:32 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 21 of 32 (427482)
10-11-2007 4:27 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by bluescat48
10-11-2007 4:16 PM


Sheesh, everyone's a critic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by bluescat48, posted 10-11-2007 4:16 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024