Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bipedalism in apes: a plesiomorphic trait?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 3 of 14 (425223)
10-01-2007 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Doddy
10-01-2007 5:19 AM


The first upright ape was also human. In the millions of years that followed, new species branched off and abandoned their upright posture to descend to what we now call "ape."
Nonsense. The first upright ape, according to this find was Morotopithecus and its close cousins had the potential ability of bipedal locomotion. It is possible that the other great apes had an ancestor that was able to walk upright. I have no reason to suspect that this fact, should it be true, means that current Evolutionary Theory as it now stands cannot explain it.
How could all apes bar one end up with the hunched over character
That question can be asked without this being an issue, we are uniquely bipedal -why? The question is why did evolution modify this trait in us so that we are bipedal specialists (Morotopithecus would probably have not been exclusively bipedal from what I have read), when it modified all the other surviving lineages to have less bipedalism?
how could our spine be so screwy if it had evolved for that long
Our spines of course, have been evolving for much longer. However, there is the possibility that our lineage flirted with both bipedalism and quadrapedalim for some time before evolving into the specialists we are.
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Doddy, posted 10-01-2007 5:19 AM Doddy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 10-01-2007 4:40 PM Modulous has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 6 of 14 (425342)
10-01-2007 9:01 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by RAZD
10-01-2007 4:40 PM


Because there was an opportunity for a bipedal ape and our bipedal capable ancestors were able to take advantage of it. Once taken there was not much opportunity for turning back.
Well yes, but the question remains: what was that opportunity that was not presented to our uncles?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 10-01-2007 4:40 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by RAZD, posted 10-01-2007 9:05 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024