Apparently, FFG did not read all his links

This one for exampl;e, http://home.planet.nl/~gkorthof/kortho14.htm, actually demonstrates some of the errors and such in lawyer Johnson's book "Darwin on Trial." It would seem that the title of the site, "Was Darwin wrong?", throws a lot of over-eager creationists..Oh well....

quote:

---

Apparently, FFG did not read all his links

---

Definitely not. Several of his links were broken. The rest were full of classic logical errors - strawmen, argument from ignorance and/or incredulity, appeals to authority, conflation of related concepts, ad hominem attacks (especially on those who are no longer here to defend themselves) and page after page of unsupported assertions. The only thing I didn't see was an honest discussion of observed data.*edit* (I forgot to mention the outright lies)[This message has been edited by zephyr, 06-11-2003][This message has been edited by zephyr, 06-11-2003]