Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 0/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Big Bang, Abiogenesis, and Evolution
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 192 of 300 (424452)
09-27-2007 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by Force
09-27-2007 1:05 AM


trossthree writes:
I was speaking metaphorically. A Christian Believes in creation, a Biologist believes in biology, and so on.
That's a clumsy metaphor. It should be more like: A biologist believes in biology (though "belief" isn't the right term), a creationist believes in creation, a Christian believes in Christ, and so on.
A Christian doesn't necessarily believe in creation and a creationist doesn't necessarily believe in Christ.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Force, posted 09-27-2007 1:05 AM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Force, posted 09-27-2007 4:26 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 252 of 300 (425518)
10-02-2007 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 250 by Force
10-02-2007 4:20 PM


trossthree writes:
All forms of Science are not proven absolute.
That's the beauty of science. Everything is open to improvement and correction. It isn't mired in "absolutes" or "proof". (You'd do well to forget those two words.)

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 4:20 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 256 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 4:45 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 254 of 300 (425523)
10-02-2007 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 253 by Force
10-02-2007 4:38 PM


Re: Lots of potentially heavy stuff
trossthree writes:
So, why is it that nonbelievers "know" that this reality is the absolute reality?
They don't. "Absolutes" are the realm of the confused.
I wonder, if any of them were on their death bed, would they claim that Science is absolute?
Nobody who knows anything about science claims it's absolute.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 4:38 PM Force has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 257 of 300 (425527)
10-02-2007 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 256 by Force
10-02-2007 4:45 PM


trossthree writes:
I don't think it is rational in any sense to forget any understanding.
I suggested that you forget the words "absolute" and "proof" because you don't have any understanding of them. Neither has any value in discussions of science.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 256 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 4:45 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 4:52 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 262 of 300 (425535)
10-02-2007 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by Force
10-02-2007 4:52 PM


trossthree writes:
However, the words absolute and proof do have value in reality.
You can't divorce reality from science.
Unless you can relate it to the Big Bang, Abiogenesis and Evolution somehow, we'll have to take your misunderstanding of science to another topic.
Alot of people come to the EVC forum seeking truth in reality.
If they're seeking The Truth™, they want a cult, not EvC.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 4:52 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 5:18 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 264 of 300 (425541)
10-02-2007 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 263 by Force
10-02-2007 5:18 PM


trossthree writes:
However, to reduce an open mind to just Science is simply irrational.
I never said anything about "reducing" an open mind to "just" science.
You demonstrated what your idea of an "open mind" is when you applauded CTD for his patently closed mind.
Now I am a Theistic Evolutionist.
I suspect that most evolutionists would ask you to get off our side until you learn something about what science is.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 5:18 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 5:43 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 267 of 300 (425555)
10-02-2007 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 266 by Force
10-02-2007 5:43 PM


trossthree writes:
In some cases if a theory has been rigorously tested and supported it is considered a fact(such as TOE and BIG BANG).
Not quite.
Evolution is a fact. Period. It can be observed, just like gravity can be observed. Evolution would be a fact even if there never was a Theory of Evolution.
A theory is an explanation of a fact. The Theory of Evolution explains how the fact of evolution works.
As I understand it, the Big Bang is considered to be a fact by cosmologists. I'm not sure if there is a Big Bang Theory - i.e. an explanation of how the Big Bang happened.
Abiogenesis is also considered to be a fact. Once there was no life, now there is life. It must have started somehow, somewhere. We have no complete explanation yet as to how it could have happened, but we have a lot of pieces of the puzzle. We likely never will have an explanation (theory) of how it did happen, since chemicals don't leave fossil evidence.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 5:43 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 6:08 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 269 of 300 (425560)
10-02-2007 6:18 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by Force
10-02-2007 6:08 PM


trossthree writes:
However, all you are doing is nit picking at what I forgot to mention....
Hardly. Going from, "In some cases if a theory has been rigorously tested and supported it is considered a fact," to, "A theory is an explanation of a fact," is no nitpick. It's a fundamental misunderstanding.
The facts come first. There may or may not be a theory to explain them.
A theory never "becomes" a fact.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 6:08 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 270 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 6:34 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 271 of 300 (425571)
10-02-2007 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by Force
10-02-2007 6:08 PM


trossthree writes:
The idea of evolution started with an observation. If there was no observation of evolution, how could we even know of the idea of evolution?
Evolution is a property of living things. It would still happen even if there was no "idea" of evolution. If there never were any intelligent beings to have ideas, there would still be evolution.
However, a fact is not a fact unless a observation is made.
That sounds like the old tree-falls-in-the-forest koan.
You can semanticize all you want about what constitutes a "fact". What's important is that the phenomenon happens whether or not anybody observes it or has any ideas about it.
That's why the old creationist fallacy of "you weren't there" is so wrong. The events still happened and left traces that we can observe.
I do believe that the chemicals in fossils can bond with other chemicals which means chemicals can leave fossil evidence.
Yes, it's true that chemicals can leave traces of what happened in the past - e.g. banded iron formations. I just meant that we don't have the equivalent of fossil evidence for abiogenesis. It's easy enough to recognize a trilobite or T. Rex fossil. It's a little harder to trace the ancestry of an adenine molecule.
In some cases a theory can be considered a fact and in some cases there is a fact with a theory such as abiogenesis.
I think you're still missing it. A theory can be considered robust, reliable, useful, etc. but a theory and a fact are two different things.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 6:08 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 272 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 7:44 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 273 of 300 (425579)
10-02-2007 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by Force
10-02-2007 7:44 PM


trossthree writes:
If you believe in the dating methods then yes.
First, it isn't "believe in", it's "accept". Accepting well-tested and documented methods is not "belief". It's just good thinking.
Second, if you don't accept the dating methods, you have no claim to understanding anything about science because they're intertwined with every aspect of science. You can't discard the methods or the dates without throwing all of science out the window.
We have a lot of dating threads here - including a particularly good one about correlations of different dating methods. By all means, take any doubts you have about dating methods over there.
Your quote from jar doesn't address what I said about facts and theories at all. He was saying, I think, that a fact is a fact because it tallies with other facts. For example, the age of the earth - 4.55 billion years, give or take - is a fact because every piece of evidence we have supports it. It isn't "proven", but it's a fact.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 7:44 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 8:21 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 275 of 300 (425586)
10-02-2007 8:33 PM
Reply to: Message 274 by Force
10-02-2007 8:21 PM


trossthree writes:
...read the post he was replying to....
I did. In Message 181, you said:
quote:
Even if we were 99.9999999999999999/100 sure that Abiogenesis occured we would still not have fact.
to which jar responded in Message 182:
quote:
Actually, there is a point reached where the confidence level is so high that use of the term FACT is acceptable.
We would call abiogenesis a fact long before we reached the 99.9999999999999999/100 threshold. As jar also said:
quote:
Certainly there is the possibility that new evidence might be found that will show that what was considered Fact is wrong. If that happens the term is no longer applicable.
which is why we can apply the term "fact" without a 100% confidence level being necessary.
And, as I have been saying, a fact and a theory are two different things. Nowhere does jar's post suggest otherwise.

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 8:21 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 8:39 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 277 of 300 (425588)
10-02-2007 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 276 by Force
10-02-2007 8:39 PM


trossthree writes:
We actually talked in the chat room that is what he ment...
We'll see when he gets back from his adventures. I'd be surprized if he disagrees (much) with me. And judging by your consistent/persistent misunderstandings in this thread....

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by Force, posted 10-02-2007 8:39 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by Force, posted 10-03-2007 9:03 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 293 of 300 (430136)
10-23-2007 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 292 by TyberiusMax
10-23-2007 1:05 PM


Re: The bitter simple question
TyberiusMax writes:
The only logical reasoning is that something is outside of existence(Matter,Anti-Matter, Laws,Time,Everything) and created existance.
What you're saying is that a Creator/God doesn't "exist".

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by TyberiusMax, posted 10-23-2007 1:05 PM TyberiusMax has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024