Dinoglyfs in the cave paintings?

Sir & Sirius,How do you like my collection of the most controversial dinosaurs carved, painted, hewn and described by man in the historical times:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinoglyfs.htmtikkun olam,
ojala.pauli@gmail.com
Helsinki, Finland

Hello, and welcome to EvC.I love the compilation of alleged dinosaur petroglyphs and artifacts and think that it would make for a very good debate. However, in order to promote it, you need to add some more information.Its simply too brief to be considered at this time. But I would very much like for you to expand the argument. Give your points, then ask the audience questions on the veracity of the claim.If you need help in understanding what makes a good post great, please click on the following links below to help get a general idea on what we are looking for here at EvC

---

Thou shalt not have any other Mods before Me

I do have a whole lot of references for the textual essay on the topic:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinosauruslegendat.htmThe problem is that the essay is in Finnish... How would you reckon the references as such?Pauli

Here at EvC we discourage bare links, meaning-- the use of links as the only way to support a claim. Rather, we look for posters to summarize, in their own words, the claim they wish to support. Links are used as an additional support.Let me emphasize that we want to see it in your words. Then we can consider promoting it. Edited by AdminNem, : No reason given.

How would you consider the thread/new topic of
Haeckelian embryo fakes as a backround to the White House Paper on stem cell research (8 September 2001):
http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Haeckel_poster.html
?That would be the poster at the bottom part of hte page.Pauli Ojala
Biochemis, Systems biologist
Helsinki, Finland

Since you don't seem to be following task direction very well, I'm just going to close this topic until you can compose something coherent and within the specifications I've given to you.