Suspensions and Bannings Part II

Thought it wise to nip this one in the bud. Large copy/pastes and insulting (or attempting to perhaps) a moderator in reply to a moderator post that gives instruction on how to leave comments on moderator action. Message 121

Actually I agree with this. The reason given means a week is grossly disproportionate. Upon further reflection and examining the threads I do think a suspension is probably in order: the infamous rape comment was not on topic, unnecessarily inflammatory and unrepresentative of the solicited opinion of Taz.The General Moderation thread has been cluttered up with incessant debate for almost half its 'natural' length. Whilst there was nothing inherently wrong with the post itself, it did come after moderators showed concern about the clutter and I feel that your post was off topic and just contributed to the clutter.So I'm reducing it to 2 days.

6 and 24 hours seemed to have little effect on the disrespectful tones. See Message 211 for a sample, run backwards through the thread for further details.Edited by AdminModulous, : No reason given.

---

Even a cursory glance in Evolution is antithetical to racism should convince anyone a suspension is in order. Accusing others of racism, failing to support claims, misrepresentations. All round general disaster really.--abe: suspension time increased.Edited by AdminModulous, : No reason given.

IamJoseph was given a further 48 suspension following on from further off topic discussion of speech despite AdminNosy's direction to do otherwise.
See Message 250I'm on a roll today, I'll have to go check for bees in my bonnet

Yeah, our Indian Organic food "salesman" returns, so I banned some aliases and merged them into sarahjennifer. *hat tips to jar*

See Message 253. Entirely in contrast to the spirit and the word of the forum rules.

quote:

---

Keep discussion civil and avoid inflammatory behavior that might distract attention from the topic. Argue the position, not the person.

---

From the content of the post it should be massively obvious the reason for the suspension. That it is so obvious is also a contributory factor in the length of the suspension.

See Message 223, hopefully the reason should be self-evident. Please keep it civil and respectful.Edited by AdminModulous, : No reason given.

Due to Message 3, he had previously been warned in Message 1 to avoid doing this very thing on pain of suspension, I wasn't joking.

Due to Message 65 he had previously been warned in Message 1 to avoid doing this very thing on pain of suspension. He has previously been suspended for this very thing as per Message 343 - hence the 4 days.Edited by AdminModulous, : No reason given.