quote:
They would start moving as part of the big universe state change that happened after the flood.
What? What big state change? What evidence is there to suggest that
any radically changed?
quote:
Neither of us can use science on that one to back it up.
Actually I'm going to use the time frame to show that your argument doesn't make sense.
quote:
For example, we do know that the land masses moved.
Not for the reasons you give. Your argument doesn't even address basic geology. Plates move because the magma under the plates and friction between plates. Why would they start moving 1600 years in and then slow when magma hasn't significantly changed?
Furthermore, massive movement of plates would result in huge amounts of earthquakes, tidal waves, mountain ranges everywhere
and things people would record. There is no evidence whatsoever in any recorded civilization of such upheaval. Furthermore, plates moving 5 feet a year would require heat massively more substantial then today. Where did this heat go? Plates move 1 inch a year. Your argument requires 60 inches a year. Where did that extra heat go?
quote:
For example, we do know that the land masses moved.
Your entire argument is speculation. Why did they start moving and why did they all but stop?