Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,823 Year: 4,080/9,624 Month: 951/974 Week: 278/286 Day: 39/46 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Can Nothing Exist?
stevo3890
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 59 (42756)
06-12-2003 5:18 PM


What is your opinion on this?

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by NosyNed, posted 06-12-2003 5:30 PM stevo3890 has not replied
 Message 14 by compmage, posted 06-13-2003 2:57 AM stevo3890 has not replied
 Message 27 by Syamsu, posted 06-14-2003 3:01 AM stevo3890 has not replied

  
stevo3890
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 59 (42766)
06-12-2003 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Minnemooseus
06-12-2003 5:28 PM


by nothing I mean Absouloutly nothing. A true nothing, the kind of nothing that when you try to describe it is not nothing if you know and by the way this topic has massive undertones to the Naturalism vs Creationism debate. unless you are too stupid to see the implications.
And why I can't I abstain from formly saying where i stand because if formly say my position i am forever branded as one thing or another, if i become branded my ideas will not be fully looked at or people will never accept them. Look at the way Creationists are treated by the Athiests here and vice virsa.
As for details, why leave any detail untouched if you do that you are not being thorough. If you do that you cannot give a complete answer. So should I be honored minnemooseus? Or was this some poor attempt at insult?
Sincerely, Me

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-12-2003 5:28 PM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Geno, posted 06-12-2003 6:56 PM stevo3890 has replied
 Message 7 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-12-2003 7:53 PM stevo3890 has replied
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 06-12-2003 8:09 PM stevo3890 has replied

  
stevo3890
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 59 (42788)
06-12-2003 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Geno
06-12-2003 6:56 PM


Re: Oh what the heck.
yeah i agree with that statement

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Geno, posted 06-12-2003 6:56 PM Geno has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Geno, posted 06-13-2003 4:58 PM stevo3890 has not replied

  
stevo3890
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 59 (42803)
06-12-2003 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Minnemooseus
06-12-2003 7:53 PM


i don't think evolution really fits in to the big bang, which is the forum i used (Big Bang, Cosmology) as the universe is not alive so i used naturalism (everything happening naturally. If i am mistaken well sorry.
As to the undertones to cosmology the scientific study of the origin and structure of the universe. they are not really undertones this Universe is a largely a vacuum and many would argue that a vacuum has nothing in it. I however say that nothing cannot exist.
To Creationism versus Evolution If one would argue that nothing existed before the universe, since nothing begets nothing i would say that in effect that person was aknowledging the need for a Creator.
"This forum is to debate evolution vs. creationism. Naturalism vs. creationism is some sort of side issue."
Are we supposed to talk about the universe or Evolution In the Cosmology section of this forum? AS Evolution and Cosmology are different topics It would only be natural to talk about Cosmology in the Cosmology section. What is this some kind of weird test to see if i can Argue. Unless The website I see is completely different than the one you see than I am right.
{BY EDIT - To help with readibility, I took the liberty of adding blank lines between what I interpreted to be paragraphs - Nothing else was changed - Adminnemooseus}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 06-12-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-12-2003 7:53 PM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Geno, posted 06-12-2003 8:47 PM stevo3890 has not replied
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 06-12-2003 8:51 PM stevo3890 has not replied
 Message 18 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-13-2003 2:56 PM stevo3890 has not replied

  
stevo3890
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 59 (42804)
06-12-2003 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by NosyNed
06-12-2003 8:09 PM


A true nothing, not the absence of matter but simply nothing.
Anyways the word nothing itself is an oxymoron as the word is really something not nothing, so a defination is not going to do you any good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by NosyNed, posted 06-12-2003 8:09 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by mike the wiz, posted 06-12-2003 8:36 PM stevo3890 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024