Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,829 Year: 4,086/9,624 Month: 957/974 Week: 284/286 Day: 5/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God as Artist
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5091 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 28 of 32 (427780)
10-12-2007 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Hyroglyphx
10-12-2007 7:19 PM


Re: NJ fails at logic again
Do you rest your case upon Happy Art? Its fairly simple concept: You pick up a brush, dab it in paint, smear the paint on to the canvas in such a way that corresponds to the mental image in your mind... Art.
I must ask, why does it seem 'art' the canvas forms like to utilize real conceptions for example, say a tree on a hill? Must art be actually drawn to be art? Can not art be the bare tree on the hill that isn't drawn, but the actual place?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-12-2007 7:19 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-13-2007 12:11 AM Discreet Label has replied

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5091 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 31 of 32 (427886)
10-13-2007 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Hyroglyphx
10-13-2007 12:11 AM


Re: NJ fails at logic again
Art comes from an artist. I wonder if you'd be willing to extrapolate such magnificence one step further to deduce that design comes from a Designer.
Where is the need to extrapolate any further? I mean consider tessla's art via tessalations following the ideas of more crystalline structures. That kind of 'art' exhibited in natural world occurs due to particular kinds of crystals being thermodynamically favorable.
Basically where is the need to extrapolate further when natural processes or emergent processes are occurring building something that can be construed as 'art' without having an artist around with the brush?
Edited by Discreet Label, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-13-2007 12:11 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024