TyberiusMax
In the same manner you cannot deny the hypothesis of a God who is independent of existence because he can niether be proven nor disproven because there is no evidence for either.
Why would you postulate a hypothesis of a God independent of existence since this, by default, excludes him from any interaction with the universe itself? That God can neither be proven nor disproven only means that the hypothesis has no grounds in the first place since this would allow for any possibilty { teacups in orbit,invisible,immaterial dragons in the garage, etc} whatever and thus also leaves the realm of reasonable discussion.
"A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."
Albert Einstein