Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The problems of big bang theory. What are they?
Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 135 of 389 (430859)
10-27-2007 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Elhardt
10-27-2007 10:12 PM


Re: Once more...
Welcome to EvC. Let me be the first... or second to say that you are certainly welcome to stay here and contribute to our debates here at EvC. However, might I suggest that this other forum is really what you were looking for to post your comment?
Again, welcome to our little corner of the net. Have a wonderful day.

Disclaimer:
Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style.
He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Elhardt, posted 10-27-2007 10:12 PM Elhardt has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 150 of 389 (457709)
02-24-2008 11:50 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by IamJoseph
02-24-2008 11:37 PM


Re: another problem with the big bang theory
IamJoseph writes:
But they never mention the contradiction factor in their preamble. Namely that the universe is finite, thus they always talk about a post-universe scenario only - which is fine - if they said that in their preamble. Its an indispencible factor.
And this would mean, the word ORIGIN and BEGINNING has to be taken out from that premise.
I'm sorry, is the above quote suppose to make any sense?
Secondly, an eternal impact would have to be considered with the BBT. An explosion is triggered by an external factor, because if there was an internal reason, then this would violate the BEGINNING factor again. The latter is my main problem with the BBT.
How many millions of times we have to say this before creationists hear it? The BB wasn't an explosion. It was a rapid expansion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by IamJoseph, posted 02-24-2008 11:37 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by IamJoseph, posted 02-25-2008 12:13 AM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 165 of 389 (457892)
02-26-2008 3:26 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by IamJoseph
02-25-2008 12:13 AM


Re: another problem with the big bang theory
See, IamJoseph's posts are exactly what I am talking about when I speak of creationists that are crackpots. I mean, do regular creationists actually understand this crap? If so, how come they don't come in and clarify to us lowly mortals? If not, how come they don't police themselves?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by IamJoseph, posted 02-25-2008 12:13 AM IamJoseph has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024