Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   One evolving species vs speciation.
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 4 of 48 (430813)
10-27-2007 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Taz
10-27-2007 2:13 PM


Flow or drift?
Taz, isn't the scenario you decribe as gene flow really random genetic drift ?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Taz, posted 10-27-2007 2:13 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Taz, posted 10-27-2007 8:56 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 7 by PaulK, posted 10-28-2007 8:20 AM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 9 of 48 (430926)
10-28-2007 11:13 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by PaulK
10-28-2007 8:20 AM


Re: Flow or drift?
PaulK writes:
Taz's scenario postulates an absence of gene flow betrween the two populations. That permits drift to carry them in different directions but it also gives selection more opportunity to encourage divergence.
You're right about the scenario that Taz postulates. He describes one population drifting into two. Stiil, I don't see why gene flow needs special mention. The evolutionary force in his scenario is drift, not flow. Gene flow might happen eventually, however, after all the drifted alleles are fixed in each of the new populations.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by PaulK, posted 10-28-2007 8:20 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by PaulK, posted 10-28-2007 2:33 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 16 of 48 (430970)
10-28-2007 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by PaulK
10-28-2007 2:33 PM


Re: Flow or drift?
PaulK writes:
Gene flow needs to be mentioned because it is a force that prevents populations from diverging by drift.
After a little googling I found plenty of references to support your point. I think you win on that one.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by PaulK, posted 10-28-2007 2:33 PM PaulK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Taz, posted 10-28-2007 6:03 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 17 of 48 (430973)
10-28-2007 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Wounded King
10-28-2007 3:46 PM


Re: Argument from another thread
wk writes:
So what exactly is it you object to, how do you understand the statement and what about it makes you think it demolishes the authors credibility?
Well, maybe it doesn't, given my capitulation to PaulK in the previous post. I was reacting to this statement:
quote:
Species aren't formed by selection for differing adaptive traits within a population, but by the interruption of the gene flow that is caused by migration or invasion between populations.
I think species can be formed by multiple mechanisms, not all of which are selective, as I have argued with you before in other threads. I've even posted this schematic to illustrate the different ways speciation (or macroevolution) can occur:
To argue that "species aren't formed by selection for differing adaptive traits within a population" is to ignore the role of natural selection. To argue that speciation occurs via "the interruption of the gene flow that is caused by migration or invasion between populations" is OK, but narrow. Other "forces" in addition to gene flow play their parts in speciation, too. Don't you agree?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Wounded King, posted 10-28-2007 3:46 PM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Wounded King, posted 10-28-2007 5:57 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 21 of 48 (430992)
10-28-2007 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Wounded King
10-28-2007 5:57 PM


You're right
I must admit I did not know that gene flow was a significant abatement to drift. But it makes sense to me now. So I'm backing off this one with appologies to you, PaulK, and mbg for being Pb headed.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Wounded King, posted 10-28-2007 5:57 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 22 of 48 (430995)
10-28-2007 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Taz
10-28-2007 6:03 PM


Re: Flow or drift?
Taz writes:
So, do the two words I remembered from my high school biology text book impressed you now?
Rub it in. Rub it in.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Taz, posted 10-28-2007 6:03 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Taz, posted 10-28-2007 8:05 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 25 of 48 (431000)
10-28-2007 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by jar
10-28-2007 6:11 PM


Re: Human speciation?
jar writes:
Is there a reasonable scenario for Humans to become split and isolated over a period of time long enough to result in two separate species other than our moving off world?
After thinking it over, I can't visualize one. Now I'm wondering if humans would even need to become split and isolated in order to speciate. Couldn't new alleles arrive naturally from mutation, or artificially from deliberate insertion, to survive (in rare cases) and become fixed in a population without the need for the drift-flow competition? Couldn't natural selection follow on from there to force a speciation? But whether or not this would work in the human population, I really don't know. Some say we will evolve more artificially than naturally. Maybe our own genetic engineering will be how we eventually speciate. Would that be considered a form of gene flow?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by jar, posted 10-28-2007 6:11 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by jar, posted 10-28-2007 7:44 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5528 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 33 of 48 (431019)
10-28-2007 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by AnswersInGenitals
10-28-2007 7:39 PM


Re: J. Smith: Been there, done that.
AIG writes:
The great theologian Joseph Smith taught that the interior of the earth is hollow and inhabited by a people that live on the inside surface of the earthly shell - and he must be correct since he was told this by an angle of god.. (Apparently, the inner surface people invented Velcro long before we did.) He also taught that there is a hole at the north pole through which we could enter that inner world. Now that the polar ice cap is disappearing, we should be able to enter that world and test if that inner population is reproductively isolated from us outer surface critters. Genetic analysis should determine if and when our two groups separated.
Are you familiar with Thomas Gold's "Deep Hot Biosphere"? It's right up your alley, except Gold is quite serious about thermophilic prokaryotes living in a deep, hot biosphere. His book on that suject is a favorite of mine.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 10-28-2007 7:39 PM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024