Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Evolution is not science

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution is not science
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 216 of 305 (432011)
11-03-2007 12:49 PM 		Reply to: Message 211 by IamJoseph
11-03-2007 6:32 AM

Re: the relative importance of facts
It is also a fact, that evolution is not a fact but a theory, with less facts to support it than any belief system.
​
If that is so then show me the facts to support creation.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by IamJoseph, posted 11-03-2007 6:32 AM IamJoseph has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by IamJoseph, posted 11-03-2007 3:59 PM bluescat48 has not replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 227 of 305 (432316)
11-05-2007 9:54 AM 		Reply to: Message 220 by IamJoseph
11-04-2007 5:47 AM

Re: the relative importance of facts
Is Genesis science? Where did science come from!
​
Genesis is a myth. Science comes from observation, hypothesis, Teating & drawing conclusions from the testing.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by IamJoseph, posted 11-04-2007 5:47 AM IamJoseph has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by IamJoseph, posted 11-05-2007 2:30 PM bluescat48 has replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 231 of 305 (432404)
11-05-2007 8:44 PM 		Reply to: Message 228 by IamJoseph
11-05-2007 2:30 PM

Re: the relative importance of facts
To be scientific, also means acknowledging what is science and scientific, from observation, hypothesis, Teating & drawing conclusions from the testing - without omissions. Only what is correct can counter a faulty premise, and genesis is the only source which can show ToE as faulty.
How can Genesis show ToE is faulty when it is mythological & has no scientific info at all?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by IamJoseph, posted 11-05-2007 2:30 PM IamJoseph has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by IamJoseph, posted 11-05-2007 9:54 PM bluescat48 has replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 235 of 305 (432419)
11-05-2007 10:50 PM 		Reply to: Message 233 by IamJoseph
11-05-2007 9:54 PM

Re: the relative importance of facts
The creation chapter is not mythical, and does not mention any head-bashing dieties battling for supremecy
​
why would mythology have to have head bashing deities.
​
Babylon-Oxford Engish Dictionary:
​
mythology
— noun (plural mythologies)
a collection of myths, especially one belonging to a particular religious or cultural tradition.
a set of widely held but exaggerated or fictitious stories or beliefs.
the study of myths.
​
mythologer noun
mythologist noun
mythologize or mythologise verb
mythologizer or mythologiser noun
​
ME: from Fr. mythologie, or via late L. from Gk muthologia, from muthos 'myth' + -logia (see -logy).
This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by IamJoseph, posted 11-05-2007 9:54 PM IamJoseph has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by IamJoseph, posted 11-06-2007 1:31 AM bluescat48 has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024