Homo floresiensis

I just read the lastest report and they claim it is a monkey.Kind of funny when you think about it because of all the hype it made.Seems like these things are making evolutionist look like cryptozoologist in search of the long lost manape.

The article was dated 11/14/07 in one of those scientific news articles.Im not sure but i believe it was discovery news.That makes you like all evolutionist,either a liar or misinformed.

You can find it in the evolution section.

I would if i could remember which science news site it was.Theres only thousands of them.Any way if you cant find it im sure it will be out in all of them very soon.I wish i could remember the guys name who closed the investigation that would very helpful.He said the wrist bones are monkey absolutely and that the case was closed.

Oh,another thing that will be helpful.If you run across a science news site that has a window labeled evolution at the top of the page that may be it.

That is not the article im talking about.I just read it last night and it was dated 11/14/07.And in that article they claimed the hobbits wrist was that of a monkey.

And another thing.Tool evidence is a sign they were a prey item.Did they call mammoths hunters when they found clovis points buried with them?

Good point.When i find it again i will.

ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) title;experts split over human hobbit remains.Here you will find so called expert colaberation with the alleged inability of the hobbit to have made tools.