Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 1/5


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Human Origins and Evolution ⇒

Homo floresiensis

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Homo floresiensis
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 202 of 213 (434387)
11-15-2007 6:10 PM 		Reply to: Message 199 by Jason777
11-15-2007 5:50 PM

This is a science thread.
That is not the article im talking about.I just read it last night and it was dated 11/14/07.And in that article they claimed the hobbits wrist was that of a monkey.
​
Then go to the History option on your browser and find the cite.
​
Otherwise, stop posting nonsense.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Jason777, posted 11-15-2007 5:50 PM Jason777 has not replied
  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 205 of 213 (434392)
11-15-2007 6:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 201 by Jason777
11-15-2007 5:53 PM

Bare assertions mean nothing.
And another thing.Tool evidence is a sign they were a prey item.Did they call mammoths hunters when they found clovis points buried with them?
​
The difference is:
​
Points found with prey are found IN the prey. Or the fossil bones show evidence of butchering.
Points found with Hominids are found WITH the Hominids.
​
I remind you. This is a science thread. Provide evidence of your assertions or stop posting.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by Jason777, posted 11-15-2007 5:53 PM Jason777 has not replied
  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 209 of 213 (434469)
11-15-2007 11:04 PM 		Reply to: Message 208 by Jason777
11-15-2007 10:55 PM

This is not evidence.
Your link is to the main page of a news organization.
​
We do not argue bare links here at EvC.
​
If there is a particular article that you wish to reference, you need to both provide the link to that article and show how this relates to your assertions.
​
Ned has already warned you about continuing with this sort of nonsense.
​
I suggest you step up your game.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by Jason777, posted 11-15-2007 10:55 PM Jason777 has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by AdminNosy, posted 11-15-2007 11:25 PM molbiogirl has not replied
  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 212 of 213 (434486)
11-16-2007 12:47 AM 		Reply to: Message 211 by jar
11-15-2007 11:35 PM

From Jason777's "source"
He said the earhole, palate, pelvis, tibia and femur of the Hobbit were more similar to another type of early human, Australopithecus, than Homo.
​
If this is the source to which you referred earlier...
​
Australopithecus is a hominid.
​
Not a "monkey".
This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by jar, posted 11-15-2007 11:35 PM jar has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024