Designed/created to fool science?

I propose this for the human origins section or I suppose it could fit into the ID section...Since we seem to have a large enough crowd of evolution deniers, I would like to see how the creationist crowd addresses the issue of human chromosome #2. For those not aware, Also from Wiki I know a lot of the creation crowd will simply wave this off as god simply recycling genetic materials in his grand design. Question though, how does god recycle materials that he hadn't at that point created, since god spoke the animals into existence, then crafted man from the dirt(not the animals). Additional materials:Chimpanzee genome project - WikipediaFor those adverse to reading, watch...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXdQRvSdLAsPlease discuss.Edited by EighteenDelta, : No reason given.

---

"Debate is an art form. It is about the winning of arguments. It is not about the discovery of truth. There are certain rules and procedures to debate that really have nothing to do with establishing fact ” which creationists have mastered. Some of those rules are: never say anything positive about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your opponent's position. They are good at that. I don't think I could beat the creationists at debate. I can tie them. But in courtrooms they are terrible, because in courtrooms you cannot give speeches. In a courtroom you have to answer direct questions about the positive status of your belief. We destroyed them in Arkansas. On the second day of the two-week trial we had our victory party!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

Ad hominun much? Try again, this time actually address the evidence, not me, not the presenter.And the Miller Told His Tale: Ken Miller's Cold (Chromosomal) Fusion (Updated)This is an article where is doing exactly what you claim he did not do in 2005, more than a year ago, predicting this fusion. Its even an ID support site. Wrong in so many details yet showing your lies for lies.http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoEvidence.htmlA site that has been evolving since 1999 that details a lot of the issues involved here.-xEdited by EighteenDelta, : added link

It doesn't really matter, but we do have enough nut-jobbers present, we don't need any poser-nut-jobbers. Let the genuinely deceived, support their delusions please. If they ignore it for long enough then we can let the devils advocates play their games.-x

Ironicly a large portion of this was mentioned in tonights episode of Nova on Kitzmiller -v- Dover. I expect it will be duly ignored by the creo crowd.-x

So this thread will be ignored, like the Otzi thread, like the sand thread, like the La Brea tar pits, like all the threads with concrete evidence. I guess it comes as no real surprise.