Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is the Designer Still Designing?
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3689 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 23 of 40 (435960)
11-23-2007 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Mike O Risal
03-29-2007 2:24 PM


quote:
Mike O Risal writes:
if the designer is making that happen, we're still stuck with the question of why we don't see any radically new life forms suddenly coming into existence.
If there is any place in the observable universe without a design, please point it out? - it will instantly negate the faculty of science altogether! If the world is still turning as it did before, there is no reasoning to question whether the design still subsists.
The reason we do not see any new life forms, is an affirmation of the source which first declared that speech endowed humans are the final one: here, Genesis is fully vindicated today. By subsequence, the primal factors of ToE are negated: why are there no more life forms when it is asked in accordance of the 'on-going process' premise of Evolutiuon?!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Mike O Risal, posted 03-29-2007 2:24 PM Mike O Risal has not replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3689 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 24 of 40 (435962)
11-23-2007 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Rob
04-01-2007 12:37 PM


Re: An Offense... of an answer!
Your questions are as intelligent as some of the fine factors made in the post.
quote:
With all the physical laws being relative to one another and interdependent, why do some assume that 'moral laws', if changed or bent, will not cause an opposite and equal reaction of mindless deterioration?
Does not the first part of your statement above, answer the rest: namely that the universe is an intergrated system?
quote:
Why is it that a dichotomy is introduced between physical and metaphysical realitites?
Why is this in dispute? Consider the inter-active dependency between the physical brain and the non-physical mind? Consider that in a finite universe, all physicality had to be subsequent to a non-physical proponent: because the physical components once never existed!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Rob, posted 04-01-2007 12:37 PM Rob has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024