Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,804 Year: 4,061/9,624 Month: 932/974 Week: 259/286 Day: 20/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reaching the practical end of physics?
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 68 (437370)
11-29-2007 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Hyroglyphx
11-29-2007 7:12 PM


Re: On the cusp of knowing nothing at all
c=299,792,458 meters per second (1,079,252,848.8 km/h) in an empty vacuum, not in a chilled, super-vacuum injected sodium, nor in a "vapour of laser-irradiated atoms". Even glass will slow light by 2/3. Try again.
Similarly, a joint effort made by the Rowland Institute yielded equally impressive results. This team managed to bring light waves to a one mile per hour crawl and then stopped the beam entirely. They could literally capture, and re-release light, at their whim.
Hmmm can't find anything about 1 mile per hour... they claim "a pokey 38 miles per hour" and nothing about stopping entirely or capture and "re-release at their whim." And WTF is 're-release'? Try again.
-x
Edited by EighteenDelta, : added non-sense

"Debate is an art form. It is about the winning of arguments. It is not about the discovery of truth. There are certain rules and procedures to debate that really have nothing to do with establishing fact ” which creationists have mastered. Some of those rules are: never say anything positive about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your opponent's position. They are good at that. I don't think I could beat the creationists at debate. I can tie them. But in courtrooms they are terrible, because in courtrooms you cannot give speeches. In a courtroom you have to answer direct questions about the positive status of your belief. We destroyed them in Arkansas. On the second day of the two-week trial we had our victory party!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-29-2007 7:12 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-29-2007 8:19 PM EighteenDelta has not replied

  
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 68 (437986)
12-02-2007 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by AnswersInGenitals
12-02-2007 1:40 AM


Re: Grandpatricide revisited.
My biggest problem with time travel was always, motion. Say I go back in time even 5 minutes. Where was the earth in relation to my current position 5 minutes ago? Do I appear inside the earth? In space? 30 miles up in the atmosphere? Then talk about going back in time many years. Would you even be able to see our sun? Its not an extremely bright star as stars go.
-x

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 12-02-2007 1:40 AM AnswersInGenitals has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Chiroptera, posted 12-02-2007 11:44 AM EighteenDelta has not replied
 Message 52 by cavediver, posted 12-02-2007 1:12 PM EighteenDelta has not replied

  
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 68 (443854)
12-27-2007 3:59 AM


Leave it to fundie logic to suggest that cutting funding would be good for science.
-x

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024