Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,336 Year: 3,593/9,624 Month: 464/974 Week: 77/276 Day: 5/23 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reaching the practical end of physics?
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2660 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 43 of 68 (437832)
12-01-2007 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Silent H
12-01-2007 2:54 PM


... though I don't think direct manipulation of time will ever be possible.
What you think possible and what is possible are two entirely different matters.
The possibility of time travel (re: GR) has been known since 1949.
Other scenarios have been found to permit travel into the past. For example, in 1974 Frank J. Tipler of Tulane University calculated that a massive, infinitely long cylinder spinning on its axis at near the speed of light could let astronauts visit their own past, again by dragging light around the cylinder into a loop. In 1991 J. Richard Gott of Princeton University predicted that cosmic strings--structures that cosmologists think were created in the early stages of the big bang--could produce similar results. But in the mid-1980s the most realistic scenario for a time machine emerged, based on the concept of a wormhole.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=0004226A-F77D-1D4A-90...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Silent H, posted 12-01-2007 2:54 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Silent H, posted 12-01-2007 9:26 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 47 by AnswersInGenitals, posted 12-02-2007 1:40 AM molbiogirl has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2660 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 45 of 68 (437921)
12-01-2007 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Silent H
12-01-2007 9:26 PM


You didn't bother to read the link, did you?
The bizarre consequences of time travel have led some scientists to reject the notion outright. Stephen W. Hawking of the University of Cambridge has proposed a "chronology protection conjecture," which would outlaw causal loops. Because the theory of relativity is known to permit causal loops, chronology protection would require some other factor to intercede to prevent travel into the past. What might this factor be? One suggestion is that quantum processes will come to the rescue. The existence of a time machine would allow particles to loop into their own past. Calculations hint that the ensuing disturbance would become self-reinforcing, creating a runaway surge of energy that would wreck the wormhole.
Chronology protection is still just a conjecture, so time travel remains a possibility. A final resolution of the matter may have to await the successful union of quantum mechanics and gravitation, perhaps through a theory such as string theory or its extension, so-called M-theory. It is even conceivable that the next generation of particle accelerators will be able to create subatomic wormholes that survive long enough for nearby particles to execute fleeting causal loops. This would be a far cry from Wells's vision of a time machine, but it would forever change our picture of physical reality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Silent H, posted 12-01-2007 9:26 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Silent H, posted 12-02-2007 12:06 AM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024