Discussing the evidence that support creationism

Buzz, I'm truly speachless... have you read anything that Percy has stated? A growth rate of 0.5% for 20500 years??? You've just been told that the growth rate from 1CE to 1000CE was around 0.04%. Where the hell do you get 0.5% from?

Buz, if you did use .01% then your answer would be 109 people in 60,000 years You've used 0.1% Give it up, Buz - the horse isn't just dead, it's partly fossilised - thats not a hole anymore, it's a tunnel to Australia, etc, etcEdited by cavediver, : No reason given.

NO! You CANNOT treat true population growth over some extended period this way, by picking some "appropriate" average growth rate - it is simply WRONG. Look at the rate now, at the rate 80 years ago, 200 years ago, 1000 years ago. Do these look like figures you can simply average and hope to retain some semblance of reality?You have demonstrated nothing except a willful ignorance of the subject matter.