Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,773 Year: 4,030/9,624 Month: 901/974 Week: 228/286 Day: 35/109 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anyone else notice this pattern?
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 4 of 318 (444326)
12-28-2007 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
12-28-2007 8:57 PM


So, why does everyone think this pattern exists?
My English professor once said that how clearly a person can communicate to others through his writing reflects greatly on his thought process. Poor writing skills are pretty much due to messy thought process.
It's not just poor writing skills. It's also poor speaking skills. Have you ever talked to these people?

Owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have occasionally used the academic jargon generator to produce phrases that even I don't fully understand. The jargons are not meant to offend anyone or to insult anyone's intelligence!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 12-28-2007 8:57 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Chiroptera, posted 12-29-2007 4:06 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 35 by Phat, posted 12-30-2007 4:09 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 36 of 318 (444778)
12-30-2007 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Hyroglyphx
12-29-2007 7:40 PM


Re: Postulating Poster Patterns
Nem writes:
It is a mistake to deify scientists, which all too many people on this forum, and the general public, are apt to do.
Urgg... not really.
Scientists are specialists. They can speak with authority on the subjects that are within their field of expertise. As far as I know, noone that I have ever met or heard have ever deified scientists. The only difference between a scientist and a regular person is the scientist is a specialist in some field of science.
On the other hand, the general public tend to see creationists and reverends and pastors as deities.
Let me repeat my story about the debate between the astronomer and the local pastor. The subject of the debate was astronomical evidence for an old Earth. Rather than sticking with the subject, the pastor started asking random geology questions and asserting downright lies. He was taking advantage of the fact that the astronomer wasn't a good public speaker. Almost everyone in the auditorium cheered for the pastor. At the end, people were congratulating the pastor for "knowing so much more" than the astronomer. They all thought that the astronomer was a dumbass for refusing to talk about a field that was out of his expertise area.
Nem, I don't know what planet you live on, but people in general tend to deify creationists and pastors rather than scientists.
Any discipline has its experts in that particular field. And they no doubt deserve some credit for their hard won efforts.
Then why the hell do I keep encountering real live creationists that want to disprove physics by pointing out that rocks don't orbit mountains? You know, they always try to throw everything they have at me, though it's all loads of horshit, once someone told them what I was.
But there is this wrong-headed philosophy that abounds concerning scientists -- that they are the be-all, end-all -- as if no other human being could possibly add anything of substance to any given debate.
This is absolutely not true at all. Scientists are experts in their fields of discipline. When was the last time you heard about a scientist that tried to insert scientific matters into religious classes?
For instance, I have a friend of mine who is a graduate of both MIT (Aeronautics) and CalTech...
Yes, and I'm sure he's an expert in engineering. How does this prove that scientists think they're gods?
Scientists are experts in their fields of scientific disciplines. Engineers are experts in their fields of engineering disciplines. Economists are experts in their fields of economic disciplines.
Creationists seem to be the only ones that try to insert religion into another field.
But should I assume that he is better, or more intelligent than the rest of us because of his PhD's?
Again, you are misrepresenting the truth.
He is more intelligent when it comes to engineering. Physicists are more intelligent when it comes to physics. Biologists are more intelligent when it comes to biology. And so on and so forth.
Creationists seem to be the only ones that think they're more intelligent in everything.
Added by edit.
I have to wonder. Do creationists and IDists go to doctors? I mean, why go if they know everything already?
Here is another example of a know-it-all creationist. The sad thing is in a social setting he's probably perceived as the smartest person in the group. The the same ole pattern I've been observing for years.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

Owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have occasionally used the academic jargon generator to produce phrases that even I don't fully understand. The jargons are not meant to offend anyone or to insult anyone's intelligence!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-29-2007 7:40 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by tesla, posted 12-31-2007 12:19 AM Taz has not replied
 Message 39 by obvious Child, posted 12-31-2007 3:27 AM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 57 of 318 (447563)
01-09-2008 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by obvious Child
01-08-2008 7:33 PM


Re: Know Your Audience
bleedingly obvious child writes:
Exactly. It's how you write, not in the aspect of appearing intelligent but your tone. Many science people have met defeat in debate because they came off hostile to an audience that believed literal genesis was true. In the same way that evangelicals are more or less reviled by non-evangelicals even though they believe in much of the same doctrine and beliefs as non-evangelicals who are seen in a much better light by most people.
Generally, in a popular debate the one that sounds nicer or tells a better sounding story wins. I learned this the hard way. Let just say that my audience walked way saying "wow, science is full of crap" after I accidently let it slipped out something like "it's obvious, I can't believe I have to explain this..."
Anyway, sometimes I think it's the intention of creationists to annoy people like myself and make us push ourselves over the edge, in turn giving them the upper hand.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by obvious Child, posted 01-08-2008 7:33 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by obvious Child, posted 01-09-2008 7:26 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 60 of 318 (447575)
01-09-2008 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by riVeRraT
01-09-2008 7:39 PM


riverrat writes:
I'll tell you what pattern I did notice, that supposedly higher educated, rational thinkers rarely know which way to turn a screw driver, can't hang a picture, or change their oil.
Speak for yourself... I mean speak for someone else...
When I was a poor college student, one time I rear ended someone because the bastard 2 cars in front of me decided to slam on his break on a packed highway. I was the 3rd car down so I had the least time to react. Insurance decided that it wasn't 100% my fault.
Anyway, insurance gave me a check to have the car fixed. I spent that money on college tuition and other stuff. About the car, I went to half a dozen junk yards to find the parts I needed to fix my car, and let me tell you it was a total wreck. I basically had to replace almost everything from the driver's seat to the front. All of that I did with occasional help from my brother.
In fact, I can't remember the last time I took my car or my wife's car to a mechanic for something as routine as an oil change. I do all of that myself. Heck, I even rotate my own tires.
I've noticed there is a big difference in talking about how the world works, and actually working on it.
Why in the world did you vote for Bush, then? Wouldn't it have been better to have vote for John Edwards? He at least spent a part of his life having his hands on things.
I've noticed so called "dumb" people, have more street smarts and common sense than most "educated" people. Autism kids are an example of just how people are good in some areas, and not good in others.
I agree. Perhaps NASA should have hired "dumb" people to plan for the missions to other planets. Heck, let's hire "dumb" people to design the next kick-ass passenger jet.
It's like your saying to us, only stupid people believe in God, and smart people are the ones that actually know what is going on. I fear not because I know God will show you different one day nator, as He did me. There's that chip I was talking about (bluegenes). The higher up you put yourself on that pedestal, the longer it is to fall.
No. We're saying you guys stick with the street smarts and leave the academic stuff to us. Stop trying to tell us what science is and isn't. We don't try to tell you which wrench to use on what.
Scientists and academics are nothing more than specialists. Despite popular beliefs among "dumb" people, we really don't believe we're gods. We don't try to tell our mechanics which screw drive to use anymore than you don't try to tell your doctor which prescription he should give you (I'm assuming you don't micromanage how your doctor treat you).
We each have our own niche in society.
Long live God, Nascar, beer, 3 wheelers, and people who can't spell who have no teeth. end rant.
Well, long live Mozart, Rachmaninoff, and Mendelssohn... and Newton, Heissenberg, and Darwin! Rant disengaged.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by riVeRraT, posted 01-09-2008 7:39 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by riVeRraT, posted 01-10-2008 1:03 PM Taz has replied
 Message 272 by Hill Billy, posted 01-26-2008 2:29 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 69 of 318 (447723)
01-10-2008 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by riVeRraT
01-10-2008 1:03 PM


riverrat writes:
moi writes:
In fact, I can't remember the last time I took my car or my wife's car to a mechanic for something as routine as an oil change. I do all of that myself. Heck, I even rotate my own tires.
What ever made you think you were one of those who can express themselves well? People who lose their temper often are not among the ranks of people expressing themselves well.
Riverrat, as much as I appreciate you responding to me, I'm not sure how your reply has anything to do with the quoted text. Does it make any sense to you?
But to be fair, I have never said that I can express myself better than most others. In fact, I have said this many times now, that I am not very articulate, and because of this I try to be as clear as I can by writing out a thought the way I would say it out loud. In other words, I write the way I talk.
And no, I hardly ever got good grades in English classes.
What do street smarts and common sense have to do with designing a jet or going to the moon? Talk about missed points.
But riverrat, that's exactly the point. It's people who claim to have the street smarts who always seem to try to tell scientists what to do. Ask yourself this question. Are you a biologist? Are many creationists biologists?
As I have stated many times before, the source of my frustration is having to deal with "if gravity is real how come rocks don't orbit mountains" on a semi-regular basis. Sure, the answer is simple, but if you don't have the basics already it will take a while to explain.
Tell you another thing. I belong to a R/C plane club, and there is 100 members. Most of them are engineers, doctors, lawyers, etc. When they need someone to maiden there plane, they call me. Most of them can't actually fly the dam things. As a matter of fact a professor of aeronautics has asked me to maiden his UAV he designed and built with his students (video to follow when it happens). I said ok, but I made him change his plane around. Seems he designed it with too much wing loading, and the thing would never fly.
Oh, I have no doubt of that.
But again, ask yourself this question. Are you a biologist? Are many creationists biologists? Are many creationists physicists? We don't try to tell you which wrench to use on what. Why is it that you people are trying to tell us what's scientific and what's not?
It's not that education doesn't impress me, or that it is not important. It's just that stupid people will always be stupid I guess.
I never said education should impress anyone. In fact, some of the people have the most respect for never went to college.
It's that in society we each have our niche, riverrat. We don't try to tell you which wrench to use on what and please don't try to tell us what's scientific and what's not.
My whole point is that not everyone can be good at everything, and the way you express yourself in writing may not have anything to do with how smart you are, or if you are right or wrong.
I agree. Take a look at our very own Brad McFall. I've tried many times to understand some of his more complex messages. I've even tried to read them while I was drunk.
But then again, it is a general trend that we see creationists who can't write very well present the most bogus "evidence" for creation. Ok, we can say all we want that how well you express yourself doesn't necessarily reflect your intelligence, but the fact remains that we do observe on a regular basis that people who can't express themselves very well are often people who present questions like "if people came from monkeys how come there are still monkeys around?"
Surely, even you can see why we are frustrated.
Any engineer who doesn't listen to his laymen will soon find himself at the wrong end of a bad design.
This why most engineers I've met are also creationists?
No amount of "academic stuff" will ever get us were we want to be, or increase knowledge. Sooner or later someone has to be able to put it together to see if it works. I know plenty of "engineers" who don't know their ass from there elbow, and plenty of laymen who try to design stuff, and practically put peoples lives in danger. The beauty should be in working together, a trait I never see you exert.
Again, why is it that NASA hire scientists and engineers to design plantary missions rather than street smarts people?
I've said this many times. I really really appreciate hands-on inquiries. I fix my own car, rat. I change my own oil. I intalled my own wooden floor. I built my own computer. I change my own tires. I do all of that and more. But every once in a while I still have to go to a mechanic.
What does this tell us? It tells us that we experience is just as important as book smarts.
Ok, let's take it a step further. Creationists want us to teach the literal 6 day creation and noah's flood in the science classroom. Experience is more important than science, right? Have any of you creationists seen god? Were any of you guys there when god wiped out the world with a world wide flood? I'm sure you guys have lots of experience on how noah was able to feed all the animal onboard for a year. I'm sure you guys have lots of experience on how the marsupials were able to get to Australia from the Middle East after the flood.
Surely, even you can see why we are frustrated. Have you ever gone out on a fossil hunt? Why are you trying to tell geologists what's science and what's not? Have you performed genetics experiments? Why are you trying to tell geneticists what to do? Have you done some hands-on on rocket science or astronomical observations? Why are you trying to tell physicists that they're a bunch of dumbasses?
Surely, you can see why we are frustrated.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by riVeRraT, posted 01-10-2008 1:03 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by riVeRraT, posted 01-11-2008 12:47 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 259 of 318 (450976)
01-25-2008 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 258 by SGT Snorkel
01-25-2008 9:52 AM


Re: Not Quite
Snorkel writes:
heinrik writes:
Evolutionists cannot prove their case against creationists
Only partially correct.
Actually, Heinrik's got a point there. It really requires years of studies and discipline to be able to connect all the dots of the various scientific studies and fields to see and understand for yourself all the evidence against the biblical account. On the other hand, to believe in a 6 day creation 6 thousand years ago is the default belief because many people grew up indoctrinated by their christian parents.
This has been the source of my frustration for many years as I have seen over and over scientists losing on the debate floor to people who were ignorant beyond belief just because those ignorant people appealed to the ignorance of the masses.
The other thing is we are seeing a lot of creationist patterns in this thread, the same pattern that they themselves don't even recognize. Again, it really takes years of discipline to really recognize these fallacies and fallacious thinking patterns. These creationist tactics REALLY DO WORK when they have to explain themselves to the masses. It's only when they are faced with really educated people like judges and scientists that their arguments fall apart.
If we are talking about swaying public opinion, creationism really has the upper hand in this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 258 by SGT Snorkel, posted 01-25-2008 9:52 AM SGT Snorkel has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 261 by Percy, posted 01-25-2008 11:52 AM Taz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024