Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8914 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 06-27-2019 6:42 AM
32 online now:
Meddle (1 member, 31 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: ooh-child
Post Volume:
Total: 854,844 Year: 9,880/19,786 Month: 2,302/2,119 Week: 338/724 Day: 1/62 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
2
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 13.0
nator
Member (Idle past 343 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 283 of 312 (442568)
12-21-2007 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by Silent H
12-20-2007 6:53 PM


Re: crash...
quote:
Just kidding. I can take it. But I do think its odd who gets whacked for saying what. I never know what's legitimate commentary around here.

Well, crash has been suspended for stuff like that in the past, and more than once.

I think the big difference in this particular case was that CS's post was just an abusive attack with no content whatsoever. He was obviously only interested in being mean and made no effort at all to correct brenna or discuss anything.

Crash, on the other hand, can pepper his very well-written, thoughtful posts with jabs, but he rarely just hauls off and clocks somebody with pure abuse. But, there's usually a lot of good stuff in those posts as well.

CS's post had no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

Edited by nator, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Silent H, posted 12-20-2007 6:53 PM Silent H has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 284 by Silent H, posted 12-22-2007 9:08 PM nator has not yet responded

  
nator
Member (Idle past 343 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 297 of 312 (444307)
12-28-2007 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 292 by AdminPD
12-28-2007 8:38 PM


Re: AdminPD.
quote:
If you read the discussions completely, I think you find that nator did not continue to push the idea that I was retaliating and Rrhain didn't insinuate that I was pushing a personal agenda.

Er, so what if I didn't push?

I certainly didn't retract, did I?

My assesment of your moderation at that time is unchanged.

Is still think it was payback, regardless of if I let it go at the time.

I think it is hilarious that you are constantly encouraging people to "let go" of issues such as this, yet here you are, trying to bolster your position by implying that the reason I stopped "pushing the issue" was because I didn't think I was justified. I didn't "keep pushing" because I very much think you would have have suspended me.

I was justified, PD, but I was already too familiar with your startlingly inexhaustable ability to avoid addressing arguments to wish to experience the "Purpledawn Runaround" yet again.

There wasn't enough Dramamine in the world for me to want to do that particular dance again at that moment.

Edited by nator, : No reason given.

Edited by nator, : No reason given.

Edited by nator, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 8:38 PM AdminPD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 302 by AdminPD, posted 12-29-2007 8:14 AM nator has responded

  
nator
Member (Idle past 343 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 306 of 312 (444438)
12-29-2007 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 302 by AdminPD
12-29-2007 8:14 AM


Re: AdminPD.
quote:
What exactly do you feel happened to me in that thread, that would warrant "leaning" on you almost a week later?

We called you on pretty much what you are doing now.

You like to play dumb in order to avoid addressing rebuttals.

We also illustrated the illogic and inconsistency of your position regarding alternative health, showed that you tend to stonewall to avoid rebuttals, and are pretty much unwilling and/or unable to tell the difference between good evidence and bad evidence.

quote:
Just because you retaliate because you don't like what someone says doesn't mean everyone else reacts that way.

When have I ever "retaliated" as a Moderator?

That's the material difference, PD. I wouldn't care at all if you had "come after me" as Purpledawn, but you did it as AdminPD.

quote:
I didn't bring this up hon, molbiogirl did. I can only go by what you wrote. I can't read behind the lines. The subsequent discussion did not support her point.

Right.

That's why I am letting you know nowwhy I didn't "push the issue" then. I am setting the record straight, lest you erroniously think that I didn't believe I was justified in having my suspicions, as your recent comment to MBG implies.

Bored now.

Edited by nator, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by AdminPD, posted 12-29-2007 8:14 AM AdminPD has not yet responded

  
Prev1
2
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019